General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden urges return to office
WASHINGTON For the second time in a week, President Biden on Friday urged for an end to remote work, framing the much-delayed return to the office for millions of white-collar workers as necessary for the United States to move beyond the pandemic.
Because of the progress weve made fighting COVID, Americans can not only get back to work, but they can go to the office and safely fill our great downtown cities again, Biden said during remarks from the White House that touched on Februarys encouraging job numbers, which saw the unemployment rate fall to 3.8 percent.
Most Americans can remove their masks, return to work and move forward safely, the president said. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention loosened its guidance for face coverings last week; before that, many Democratic states had already dropped mask mandates.
Biden's remarks came on the same day that New York City Mayor Eric Adams ended a vaccine mandate in the citys public schools, as well as a proof-of-vaccination mandate for businesses like restaurants. Coming in the nations largest city, those moves had the effect of compounding Bidens message.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/biden-urges-return-to-office-214733870.html
BGBD
(3,282 posts)And it has nothing to do with covid.
48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)So no thanks.
634-5789
(4,175 posts)tritsofme
(17,376 posts)We are allowing leases to expire left and right, and massively consolidating.
For lots of jobs, there is no going back and nowhere to go back to.
paleotn
(17,911 posts)We were bursting at the seams as it was. It's now ops. space and we have shared offices when we need to go on site.
tritsofme
(17,376 posts)If I need to do an in-person meeting, Im flying to Salt Lake.
Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)At the very least, many people will do a hybrid thing where they go in once a week, or a couple of times a month for status meetings and such, but do most work from home. For white collar, it's probably the wave of the future.
smb
(3,471 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)BGBD
(3,282 posts)Been working remotely for two years and haven't found a single time I thought it would be better to be F2F
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)People are pretty much dead set against it since they now know that they can accomplish what needs to be done without sitting in traffic for a few hours a day, not to mention the numerous other benefits of wfh and the measured increased productivity. I don't have much of a commute since I live in the city, so I don't mind going in few days per week, but most people I know who drive in from the burbs are really against it.
The only people who seem to be pushing this "back to the office" thing are middle aged (and usually white) men who need to feel like they have some "fiefdom" to lord over in order to feel powerful and important.
They can't stand their perceived lack of usefulness in a world that is increasingly seeing their uselessness. They are just another layer of the hierarchy that does very little actual work. Their fear and insecurity is almost palpable when you see them in person. You can almost see them sweating it out as they push for changes to make "in office" work a requirement.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)are going to lose a lot of good employees to other employers who are more accommodating.
LonePirate
(13,417 posts)Many people can work as easily from home as from an office. Allowing workers to work from home makes most workers happy and it potentially can save businesses money as they can downsize their office footprints. The excess office space and be converted to housing, something most cities need more of, usually in significant amounts. It's a winning scenario for almost everyone.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)90% of my office (approx 5K employees) have been back for months. This week, all were told to return by April 4, and that accommodations would be made for thosethat needed them. My friend in HR told me they already had 200 requests. (Eye roll)
not happening, sorry
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)You would. But, with some work-from-home flexibility.
I've been in the office since Sept 2020...no issue.
Celerity
(43,330 posts)possible to extrapolate that out and apply it across the board.
I personally work from home and sometimes at the office. Really makes no difference to me. Many people feel otherwise, so I am not going to apply my situation to the rest of them.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)You are a white male middle-manager. Seems to be a popular opinion among such types.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)And let me guess, youre never mind. No good being a contrarian here.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I am a well paid professional at a Fortune 100 company that values it's employees and their opinions. Not all of us are professional babysitters and need to have total control over other people by having bodies at desks.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,327 posts)VarryOn
(2,343 posts)Some employees are, no doubt, milking covid to WFH.
I've said this before because I believe it...a WFH employee is 66% the employee as one in the office. They are not as accessible nor are they a part of all the hallway and office discussions that crop up. And I can't tell you how many times I've gone into a meeting where it was decided it wasn't worth the bother to include someone working from home.
People insisting on working from home at this point aren't helping their careers.
Most studies find that productivity goes up with people working from home. People are excluded from hallway and office discussions in person all the time. Deciding it's not worth the bother to include someone working from home often means they didn't need to be in the meeting anyway or would have been included only to meet some protocol that obviously can be ignored.
smb
(3,471 posts)Prejudice tends to be dissipated over comm links because of the lack of in-your-face contact, and sexists can't pinch butt or grab pussy in a teleconference.
MichMan
(11,912 posts)Anyone who works in manufacturing, health care, retail, transportation and service industries are not allowed the option. This would include a vast number of POC.
meadowlander
(4,394 posts)Pre-Covid I was about to quit because the noise levels and constant interruptions in an open plan office were making my physically ill.
Now I WFH full time, get twice as much done with a tenth of the stress, have two hours of commuting a day back to do what I want with, never gets colds or flu so I take less sick leave and save on the emissions.
Biden need to lay off on butting his nose into where people chose to work. Or if he must, he should be supporting WFH because of the climate benefits and additional flexibility it gives to workers to live further away from the office in more affordable housing.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)I'm back in the office 3 days per week now, but that's due to the nature of my work, much of which can't be done from home (I'm with DoD). Savings in commuting time and emissions are wonderful.
I have six direct reports under me, and between them, 42 other employees. Even though much of our work needs to be done inside the office, I work closely with my direct reports to ensure that we are doing all we can to maximize flexibility for our employees, whatever that may be for them.
We have a few employees who prefer to be in the office all the time, but most want at least one or two days per week at home. From a management perspective, it's a bit more work to ensure that we have the "inside" coverage we need for classified issues, but I view a big part of my job as ensuring that my employees are able to achieve a satisfactory work/life parity. That means conducting unclassified work in the unclassified environment so that people are able to continue with a degree of telework. It also means pushing back on leadership above me when they get into the "people need to be in the office to do anything productive" mindset.
I'm a 60 year old male, BTW.
smb
(3,471 posts)You can insist otherwise based on your hunches and feelings, just like some people insist that drinking bleach and shoving sunlamps up your ass is superior to vaccination, but neither one is what the science says.
Any particular reason? Other than just because your company had to?
Jedi Guy
(3,185 posts)I began working from home in early 2018 as my employer didn't have enough seats for all of us. Then in 2019, they announced they were closing the office I worked from and thereafter everyone would work from head office in Toronto. My team was assured we were exempt from that, only for that to turn out to be a lie. I was the first to leave, but by no means the last. Last I heard, 75% of the team found other employment. That's quite the brain drain, no?
In my current role as a supervisor, I log in early, I stay late, and I'm available to my operations managers after-hours and on my days off when they need help in an emergency. I figure it's my way of giving back, since the company respects my work/life balance enough not to demand that I needlessly go to a particular building. As others have pointed out, studies have shown that productivity actually goes up when people work from home. Weirdly enough, it turns out that people are happier, and therefore work harder, when they feel like their employer respects their work/life balance and doesn't place needless demands on them.
WFH isn't for everyone, of course, because it takes a lot of self-discipline. I have a few problem employees in that regard, but the vast majority of my people do just fine working from home, largely because my fellow supervisors and I keep them productive and on task. But there are problem employees in every organization.
Biden's argument has nothing to do with the merits of WFH and everything to do with getting office workers back into buildings in urban core areas so they can support the cafes, restaurants, coffee shops, retailers, and other downstream economic elements that rely on them. I get where he's coming from, but the economy has changed and there's probably no going back at this point.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Breakfast and lunch providers, bars after work. These are the businesses that suffer from large scale WFH
smb
(3,471 posts)Obviously, people eat breakfast and lunch somewhere, so there's no net economic impact either way.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Yes, I eat breakfast and lunch but I do so at home. There is no quick stop on the way into the office for coffee. No running out at lunch. And I don't decide spur of the moment to grab a beer at a bar after a long day.
There is a big difference. I've saved a great deal of money by not going to work.
I don't think the broken window fallacy fits here.
smb
(3,471 posts)The whole point of the broken window fallacy is that having to spend money on a necessary evil (replacing a broken window in the original metaphor, commuting and eating at business-district shops in this situation) does not actually benefit the economy, because the money spent on the necessary evil is money not available to spend on something else.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)At home I buy a bag of coffee beans and use my coffee maker to make a pot of coffee. The price per coffee is probably around ten cents. Even when I drove to work I made coffee at home first. Stopping by your coffee shop of choice and getting a large coffee is like $3 with the tip (way more if I decide to get something fancy).
Same for lunch. At home I grab leftovers or throw together a grab something quick. Probably totally cost is less than $2. At work while I should pack my lunch, I don't. I end up ordering something delivered, running out for fast food or meeting work colleagues. This can cost anywhere from $8 -$15.
My grocery bill is probably no different working from home vs going into the office but I spend a great deal less because I'm not paying for coffee or lunch out.
smb
(3,471 posts)1. Use it to light cigars,
2. Bury it in the back yard,
3. Glue it to your walls, or
4. Buy something else with it?
Again, that is precisely the point of the Broken Window Fallacy -- the answer is (almost certainly) #4, which means that the economy benefits just as much either way.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)But even if I spent on say, imported cigars, the local economy I was spending it on was not getting my money.
I also spend less on gas, less miles on my car and I spend significantly less on clothes.
There is a great deal of downstream economic impact to people working from home.
I'm not saying I'm pro back to the office work. I think good workers are even better workers at home. I think poor workers are still poor workers. Let's face it, you can go to the office and not do your job. I've watched people do it for years. I'm just saying it will change our economy.
One last aside on poor workers: hard core right wingers are by far the worst workers out there. Their problem solving skills suck. They always seem distracted.
Mr.Bill
(24,282 posts)but I feel the same way you do. And with the money I saved, I might be going out to dinner more often.
MichMan
(11,912 posts)Mariana
(14,854 posts)The unemployment rate is very low. People are working.
MichMan
(11,912 posts)"Obviously, people eat breakfast and lunch somewhere, so there's no net economic impact either way."
smb
(3,471 posts)Some businesses don't do as well as they did before (ones dependent on walk-in traffic in office zones); others do better than they did before (ones situated to serve people working at home, who either buy more groceries or take lunch breaks near home).
That has been the way of the world ever since Og the caveman found a couple of rocks to bang together and make a fire more easily than Grog the caveman rubbing two sticks together.
meadowlander
(4,394 posts)meadowlander
(4,394 posts)when they don't need to?
WFH is the future. Breakfast and lunch providers can adapt (by providing delivery) easier than the climate can adapt to greenhouse gas emissions.
Meowmee
(5,164 posts)That needs to be expanded not ended. Adams ended vaccine mandate etc. this country is a joke.
paleotn
(17,911 posts)20th century thinking in my view.
As good a job as Biden is doing, sometimes he's a bit too set in old-time ways.
paleotn
(17,911 posts)Then there's the add on businesses around work hubs. I get it, but it's just not necessary or cost effective in many cases. Our economy goes through spells of creative destruction like this. You can't stand still.
dem4decades
(11,282 posts)from their staff when they are working remotely. The company is happy with that.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,415 posts)tman
(983 posts)onecaliberal
(32,829 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)research, which is rather difficult to do at home. Still, around 85-90% of those in the building where I work continue to work from home, and it will be interesting to see how much pressure corporate chooses to apply, in order to get them to return to the office.
onecaliberal
(32,829 posts)BlueTsunami2018
(3,491 posts)Away from idiotic middle micro management, office politics and people stealing their lunches.
Of course, we blue collar people have never had that luxury. Ive been out in this the entire time. Cant build buildings from home.
paleotn
(17,911 posts)easier parking, no lines in the cafe or just putting up with us desk jockeys in general.
Tree Lady
(11,451 posts)But hated office politics and clicks.
smb
(3,471 posts)That's why people who depend on office politics and cliques (instead of actually doing a good job) for advancement are panicking over the trend toward long-term telework.
Tree Lady
(11,451 posts)Ass kissers
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Exactly!
tenderfoot
(8,426 posts)WFH is a godsend in that area.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)Folks don't want to go back to the office...
Tree Lady
(11,451 posts)Covid. Workers love it, save money on childcare, commuting, have more time. Bosses can save money by having smaller offices. Most workers get more done without distractions.
My daughter says she goes in once a week now but gets much less done because of people disturbing her at desk.
Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)As your daughter said, less unnecessary interruptions. I can focus on each task and get them done quickly and efficiently.
I also work in off hours because I like getting things done. Hrm, that needs to be done tomorrow. Ill just knock that out tonight while watching tv, and then I dont have to worry about it.
I would never do that if I was in the office all day.
Tree Lady
(11,451 posts)To get off early or works a bunch of long days to get a half day off. As long as she is in zoom meetings she can make her own hours.
She works for big accounting firm taxes for large banks.
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)I logged in early much earlier than anyone else got my hours in and logged off between 2:30-3 p.m. I also worked later if the work was there. I would keep checking the queues, doing stuff as it came in, and in the meantime relaxed by doing light chores and other things. Now during slow times in the office, I fight to stay awake and my mood goes through the floor.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)space meetings was so distracting I could barely get anything done. It's nice to chat with my co-workers now and then, but some of the more extraverted ones will gather in groups and talk and laugh loudly so that you can barely hear yourself think. I don't know how that is supposed to be considered "more productive" by people who take the stance that being in the office is better than wfh.
They aren't getting any work done, I am not getting any work done because of the distraction and I suppose others like me aren't either.
We also have open spaces with tables that some people like to gather at for improptu meetings which is another huge distraction. It's really pretty annoying and inconsiderate toward those of us who are trying to concentrate on what we are doing.
Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)I've been in the office twice since then and had to travel once during that time which was a trip to Panama. I think I have it pretty good.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Read any newspaper article on this topic and then the comments that follow. People are not going back to full time in the office. Ever.
smb
(3,471 posts)The next variant could show up any time, and if so Biden's comment will age like potato salad left out in the August sun.
Lord knows he's an improvement over the Tangerine Toddler, but he really needs to work on the whole "think first, talk second" thing.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)It's not the President's place to tell them they shouldn't.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,327 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Of working at home. It's far more results oriented. If you want to work at 3a you can.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)The unemployment rate is very low.
smb
(3,471 posts)Does he think people aren't working at home?
That's a common GQP talking point (building on their well-established disdain for the civil service). One of Biden's faults is that he's too willing to keep listening to those people no matter how often they prove themselves to be dealing in bad faith.
Yes, although I mostly approve of the job that he is doing that is one thing about him that still irritates me and prevents me from being a less enthusiastic supporter. He is too "old school" and it's not serving him well in this day and age.
iemanja
(53,031 posts)It's not the 20th century anymore. Remote work is extremely common, and it's not going away, pandemic or not.
MichMan
(11,912 posts)Without a lot of people occupying office space, paying local and state income taxes, and supporting local businesses. Wont nearly need the same number of city employees.
If people can work from home anywhere in the country, I can see some companies outsourcing some remote jobs to other countries.
After all, if all you need is a computer and a phone, what difference does it really make if your remote employees are located halfway across the country, or halfway around the world?
Coventina
(27,104 posts)working at home or in India (also at home).
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)SO much cheaper for businesses. And people love it.
Silent3
(15,206 posts)...but my company is currently planning on only requiring us to be in the office only two days per week from now on, COVID or no COVID.
It's possible that could change later, but it's what the company intends to try to stick with on a permanent basis unless it doesn't seem to be working out for some reason.
Sympthsical
(9,073 posts)Less cars, less pollution.
He basically just urged millions more Americans to go sit in traffic. What? Whos idea was this?
I am baffled why he thinks this is even slightly a good political comment.
None of his business, really. My company found something that works, makes employees happy, and cut down on costs.
What an unnecessary political fumble. Want to anger people? Wait til they hear this one.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)It is a private decision between employers and employees. It's frankly none of his business.
And what the hell is this about? Why feed the right-wing lie that there's this huge number of potential employees sitting at home drawing unemployment? Americans have *already* gone back to work. The unemployment rate is extremely low and has been for some time.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)MerryBlooms
(11,767 posts)I do home health. Not Once did I ever consider not taking care of my clients. The supervisors are still working from home. Our union finally won us retro hazard pay. Pennies on the hours, but we won! I don't know what the answer is for anyone else, but my ass will be taking care of my clients, no matter what, and their shopping, pharmacy, etc... It's what we do.
I haven't taken time off except for my own surgery right before this all started. I am there no matter what comes, including the Almeda fire.
I agree with our President, but folks should wear a mask if they need to.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)hardluck
(638 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)talking about trump. How he had a very distorted view of reality because he lived in that penthouse and took the elevator down to work each day for SO many years . How unreal this was and how it detached him from life in the real world.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,338 posts)I saw a group of people in a restaurant yesterday, women in dresses, guys in coats and ties. I wonder if I could still tie a tie. After decades of wearing a tie to work, it's been ten or fifteen years of "casual".
Last time I "dressed up - ish", Christmas, decent slacks, a nice shirt, polished shoes. No tie, no jacket.
smb
(3,471 posts)It's pretty much only the upper-level tailored executive suits and high-fashion dresses that need to be dry cleaned these days.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Shocked to see what people were wearing.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Not to mention the whole business of "what am I going to wear today", accessorizing, makeup and all of that business.
I bought a bunch of big men's cotton button down shirts that come halfway down my thighs to wfh and and hang around the apartment when I am not going out anywhere. Of course I dress for the occasion when I do go out, but it's nice not to have to worry about it. And maybe TMI, but not having to wear a bra is so liberating! It's probably like wearing ties for men.
Dorian Gray
(13,493 posts)are still out because of COVID? then yes... they should go back.
If they're out bc they find workers are more productive at home and they can save money on renting office space... well, then WFH makes sense.
I've always worked from home bc I run a small non-profit and don't want the expenditure of renting space. I have a small office at home, and that works fine for me. My husband is a teacher, and he's been back in person since September 2020. And we've managed to not get covid. We wear masks and got vaccinated, and if we do get covid at this point, we will deal with it with the best protection we could have afforded ourselves.
Greybnk48
(10,167 posts)not to mention extra hours away from home, family and pets because of the commute.
Who the hell would want to go back to that? And this is just the barebones. There's also the office dynamic to deal with.
MichMan
(11,912 posts)Whatever works for you I guess
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)Say you would like a quiet place out in the country with some acres of land. That's not easy if you have to live near a major city where your office is located.
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)My commute is roughly 30+ miles round trip. I fill my tank about twice a week. Gas here is now pushing $4/gal. And yes, I worked in sweats, the work got done, and my bosses were happy. Shit, I was happy.
I see Bidens point but I disagree with him here.
avebury
(10,952 posts)A lot of companies and government agencies discovered over Covid that they can actually save money where it is possible to allow employees to continue to work from home if employees can demonstrate that they continue to be productive. I never go into the office unless I have a specific purpose. I love working from home. I don't have to be concerned when the weather is bad. My work day is more flexible which benefits both me and my employer. If we get any urgent requests I have the ability to jump on line and take care of it. I can work week adjust around any doctor/dental appointments. Even when I am off work, I can occasionally check my work email on my work cellphone and jump online to provide a quick response when it is needed. The downside is that I end up working more hours from home then if I work in the office. I handle a lot of projects so am seldom in the position to fully sign off when on leave.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)Boomerproud
(7,952 posts)This is a loser with both sides, judging by the replies.
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)I worked from home for the better part of 2020. I have to say I felt better physically and mentally, I was more productive, and I actually started to enjoy my work. Unfortunately, we were called back in the late fall/early winter of 2020-21, with no further remote work possible. (Im with a fairly large agency where other departments do have the option to telecommute and that rankles me and a lot of my coworkers.)
I was able, too, to save on gas and wear and tear on my car no small consideration now.
The agency is surveying employees about their jobs, and the HR person told me that a common theme is that people want the option to telecommute. I was asked what would cause me to leave, and I said without hesitation a job that allowed me to work remotely. This is the way of the future. The pandemic just drove the point home.
(Also
Im sonewhat of a lone wolf who does not need the camaraderie or togetherness with my coworkers. On the contrary, some bug the living shit out of me and make my job that much more of an onsite ordeal.)
I miss working from home.
tenderfoot
(8,426 posts)If not micromanaging their subordinates.
Sorry Mr. President, some of us do better work at home.
gulliver
(13,180 posts)Some people like going to the office; some don't.
Demsrule86
(68,555 posts)in Cleveland in the business district and when she gets out pretty late at her but good demanding job ...no one is around. She walks several blocks to the nearest parking lot...her company provides no parking near the job. I will be really pleased when she is out of there. It is not safe for a young woman. I insist she carries a rape whistle and pepper spray but no one is around.
DFW
(54,358 posts)I think I will urge returning Biden to office................