Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe fate of American elections is in Amy Coney Barrett's hands
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
b-boy bouiebaisse
@jbouie
even this underplays just how bananas then independent state legislature doctrine is, which if taken to its full conclusion, would essentially turn the clock back to the Articles.
vox.com
The fate of American elections is in Amy Coney Barretts hands
A pair of cases on the Supreme Courts "shadow docket" could eviscerate legal safeguards protecting free and fair elections.
6:05 PM · Mar 4, 2022
b-boy bouiebaisse
@jbouie
even this underplays just how bananas then independent state legislature doctrine is, which if taken to its full conclusion, would essentially turn the clock back to the Articles.
vox.com
The fate of American elections is in Amy Coney Barretts hands
A pair of cases on the Supreme Courts "shadow docket" could eviscerate legal safeguards protecting free and fair elections.
6:05 PM · Mar 4, 2022
https://www.vox.com/22958543/supreme-court-gerrymandering-redistricting-north-carolina-pennsylvania-moore-toth-amy-coney-barrett
A pair of cases are currently pending before the Supreme Court that could fundamentally rewrite the rules of US elections.
Both cases are redistricting cases. In Moore v. Harper, the North Carolina Supreme Court struck down gerrymandered congressional maps drawn by the states Republican legislature. In Toth v. Chapman, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court selected a congressional map for the state after its Republican legislature and Democratic governor deadlocked on what that map should look like.
In both cases, Republicans claim that state courts are not allowed to intervene in redistricting cases because something called the independent state legislature doctrine forbids them from doing so.
In the worst-case scenario for democracy, should the Court embrace this doctrine, state constitutions would cease to provide any constraint on state lawmakers who wish to skew federal elections in their partys favor. State courts would also lose their power to strike down anti-democratic state laws. And state governors, who ordinarily have the power to veto new state election laws, would lose this veto power.
As Justice Neil Gorsuch described this approach in a 2020 concurring opinion, the Constitution provides that state legislatures not federal judges, not state judges, not state governors, not other state officials bear primary responsibility for setting election rules.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 886 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The fate of American elections is in Amy Coney Barrett's hands (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Mar 2022
OP
This is the future of elections. The only way these Christo-fascists can retain power.
Nevilledog
Mar 2022
#4
dchill
(38,447 posts)1. Handmaid's Rules.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)2. Don't know how this will be decided, but SC held solid on trump's BS.
Nevilledog
(51,023 posts)4. This is the future of elections. The only way these Christo-fascists can retain power.
I will not be shocked if they totally destroy voting, as we know it, without blinking an eye.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)5. I'm more optimistic, but can't say you are wrong.
ymetca
(1,182 posts)3. It's quite clear
that the objective is maintaining minority rule by a cabal of racists, whether they think they are or not.
Once you've resorted to "states rights" arguments to curb the vote that's a sure sign your position is untenable, and lacking of majority support in the electorate of your own state.
The Lazarus of Old Jim Crow rises again from its Confederate grave, risen by the hand of White Jesus!
FoxNewsSucks
(10,422 posts)6. If it's up to Aunt Amy,
then we're totally screwed.
UTUSN
(70,649 posts)7. More news like we don't have enough to worry about.
Wounded Bear
(58,603 posts)8. Now that's a scary thought...