General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you think Zelenskyy will still want to have closer ties to the EU and NATO...
...if he and his country just barely survive this war, but with tens of thousands of deaths, maybe even hundreds of thousands, and Ukrainian cities turned to rubble?
Will he feel betrayed, or will he understand that we're holding back on a more direct defense of Ukraine because we have no other reasonable choice? Does Zelenskyy understand that we can't risk a broader and too likely nuclear war?
It's heartbreaking not to be able to help Ukraine more directly. Emotionally, I want the Russian invaders crushed, and for Putin to only live long enough to understand how much he fucked up before he dies.
The hard, cold reality of what can be done to help Ukraine without risking much, much worse for Ukraine and the rest of the world sucks.
Lindsay Graham was an ass for saying out loud what he did about hoping for Putin's assassination. As a representative of the US government, that was reckless and stupid.
As a private citizen, however, I feel exactly the same way. It's the only thing I can think of that will stop the carnage and destruction quickly.
elleng
(130,902 posts)at140
(6,110 posts)I heard he has dozens of food tasters before he eats the food.
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)Silent3
(15,212 posts)...and then jumping into direct assault on Russian troops by NATO forces would run exactly the same risks as direct assault on Russian troops without Ukraine being in NATO.
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)Sogo
(4,986 posts)not NATO.
RockRaven
(14,966 posts)this is over, whatever "over" means. He's going to be killed unless someone kills Putin first. And even then, maybe still.
Putin will spare nothing to get him. He cannot afford to be defied thusly.
JanMichael
(24,887 posts)...the likelihood of him making it out in one piece is low.
Sur Zobra
(3,428 posts)out to dry. Like a poster said above, Zelenskyy will be dead and Ukraine will be a pile of rubble, but we will be the ones who will feel disillusioned with our own government. This is not a proud moment for us. We are the cowards who wouldnt put everything on the line to stop a modern day Hitler
Silent3
(15,212 posts)Ukraine would be struck by nukes first, and it would be far worse for Ukraine that it is even now.
It's not cowardice to choose the least terrible of two terrible options.
Sur Zobra
(3,428 posts)NATO country in Europe? Is that when we fight back? If not then, what about the one after that? We need to stop Putin now; we cant let hundreds of thousands of people die until we do something
Silent3
(15,212 posts)I understand that this is painful to accept, that the need feel we're doing something to stop this madness and cruelty is strong, but direct intervention in Ukraine will make things worse, even worse than letting Putin keep going like this.
At least take some consolation the Putin can't do what he's doing in Ukraine now to some other country anytime soon. This war in Ukraine has already been far more costly than Putin apparently understood it would be. He won't be able to hold Ukraine without keeping a hugely expensive and draining occupying force there, and the economic shambles he's putting Russia into will cripple his ability to replenish his forces.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)I understand both views.
But I think we are already in WW3.
The beginning.
Putin is lost in the past and nobody will stop him.
He will go after some NATO country over there.
One of the small ones.
Daring NATO to do something.
He will call up some more cannon fodder and whatever equipment he has left.
He is sick old man with nothing to loose.
I do not envy President Biden on this.
Silent3
(15,212 posts)..to go after another country, even a small one, anytime soon.
Ukraine might have seemed a temptingly easy target to Putin before, but he has turned out to be very wrong. Putin has shown the world that his military (although still fearsome and terribly destructive) is weaker than we'd all imagined, and it will be more over-stretched by any effort to hold onto Ukraine by occupying it.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)The problem with Putin is his mind .
My Mother lost her mind with Parkinson's.
I spent 9 months dealing with her until we had to put her in a home.
The medication worked for a while and then stopped.
I wouldn't wish those 9 months on anybody.
Everybody is afraid of Putin.
Look up Parkinson's and dementia.
Quixote1818
(28,936 posts)Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)If Putin has Parkinson's like my Mother he might not.
My Mother was on another planet.
Silent3
(15,212 posts)...on his mind as something that could go wrong, and wasn't talking about Putin (who has become unfathomable now).
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)You can look at Putin and see he is not there ànymore.
He has that blank look.
I fear for Ukraine and the area around it.
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)the more buildings and infrastructure that Putin is allowed to destroy, the more expensive it will be for EU/NATO to help rebuild. If Russia is allowed to occupy the nation, then it becomes Putin's problem. Ultimately, Europe will need to decide how to deal with this, and quickly.
herding cats
(19,564 posts)He, or the next leader of free Ukraine, will not be worried about such diplomatic discretion in the future. Russia made sure of that.
Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)I suspect there is a lot more going on covertly.
He wants EU membership because EU membership will help Ukraine. I don't know what Ukraine's future is concerning NATO. I didn't pre-war, either.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)In the news they said we had advisors over there before the attack.
PortTack
(32,767 posts)That they take training and skill to operate
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)That can fly into a palace and inject poison into someone?
The insect drone is in the works but it only has a camera.
Deminpenn
(15,286 posts)in the EU just this past week.