Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsresponsible vs irresponsible polling in regards to a no-fly zone
As someone commented down thread, Reuters is edging up to well-costumed push polling.
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 542 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
responsible vs irresponsible polling in regards to a no-fly zone (Original Post)
EleanorR
Mar 2022
OP
Lawrence has a good explanation why a no-fly zone is not going to happen
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2022
#4
DURHAM D
(32,595 posts)1. I don't give a damn what a bunch of random people think about this issue. nt
Xoan
(25,294 posts)2. LOL ....
Do you know the difference between Britons and Americans?
EleanorR
(2,374 posts)3. He's talking about how the polls are worded and how that may skew the results
The Yougov poll to the Brits makes it clear just what a no-fly zone might mean, and the Reuters poll does not.
Yougov-
Reuters-
LetMyPeopleVote
(143,999 posts)4. Lawrence has a good explanation why a no-fly zone is not going to happen