Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Irish_Dem

(46,363 posts)
1. I think they wanted to remain neutral in the event of conflict.
Sun Mar 6, 2022, 02:25 AM
Mar 2022

I think that now they are considering NATO membership.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
4. Sweden was always sorta neutral, although...
Sun Mar 6, 2022, 02:33 AM
Mar 2022

it had its problems with neutrality in ww2. The other answer about Finland is right. They try to be neutral about Russia, but it just ain't easy.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
2. Because Finland didn't want to piss off the giant country next to them...
Sun Mar 6, 2022, 02:27 AM
Mar 2022

(that invaded them once before).

It is also an expensive addition to a country's defense budget.

radius777

(3,635 posts)
7. Exactly. I hope these 'neutral' European countries
Sun Mar 6, 2022, 02:43 AM
Mar 2022

don't expect America and NATO to come bail them out if Russia attacks. Unlike Ukraine, which begged to be in NATO but was blocked by corrupt Putin-appeasing European leaders - Finland and Sweden have chosen not to be in NATO. Europe as a whole (including existing NATO nations) have to start contributing more to their own defense. The reason they have so much better healthcare than we do is because our taxes have to fund a large military - that they expect will protect them should Russia attack. F that - let them start stepping up and contributing more to their own defense and to collective Western security.

Straw Man

(6,622 posts)
5. Finland had a precarious relationship with Russia ...
Sun Mar 6, 2022, 02:36 AM
Mar 2022

... dating back to the treaty they signed with the Soviets in 1948. Despite two armed conflicts with Russia between 1939 and 1941, the Finns managed to hang on to their autonomy, albeit with some restrictions, like a limitation on the size of their armed forces. This is more than can be said for most of Eastern Europe.

The Finnish attitude has been described as "bowing to the East without mooning the West." After the breakup of the Soviet Union, the Finns stayed on essentially the same path, but I think they are now reconsidering.

Celerity

(43,048 posts)
6. we (Sweden) have not been in a militarily alliance or went to war for 208 years, since 1814
Sun Mar 6, 2022, 02:37 AM
Mar 2022

The Napoleonic Wars was the last time. We have sent peacekeeping troops multiple times.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why didn't Finland and Sw...