Mark Meadows blatantly committed voter fraud, a felony,

[gab13by13]

I expect nothing will come of it. I again apologize for a Raw Story link, but it tells the story, just wade through the ads.

https://www.rawstory.com/mark-meadows-2656854117/

[Tadpole Raisin]

1. I'm sure he'll get 6years in prison for committing voter fraud.

Or nothing will happen.

Hmmmm…


Edited to add:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/why-did-mark-meadows-register-to-vote-at-an-address-where-he-did-not-reside/amp

[Cobalt Violet]

2. He's white and republican.

Nothing will happen to him.

[fightforfreedom]

3. I still believe Meadows will sing like a canary when indicted.

[gab13by13]

8. Day 81 since the select committee sent DOJ

Meadow's criminal referral. Please don't tell me to be patient, thanks.

[CrispyQ]

10. In the meantime...

Declining share of Americans see Trump as primarily responsible for Jan. 6
BY REBECCA BEITSCH - 02/08/22

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/593349-declining-share-of-americans-see-trump-as-bearing-a-lot-of

snip...

The number of Republicans who say Trump bears no responsibility at all for the attack grew from 46 percent to 57 percent over the last year, while the share of Democrats who see Trump as having "a lot" of responsibility for the attack dropped from 81 percent to 70 percent.

The survey also found the public largely divided over how much attention should be paid to the Jan. 6 attack and its impacts, with roughly a third of those surveyed responding that too much, too little and the right amount of attention has been given to reviewing the day.

The poll was conducted between Jan. 10 and Jan. 17 among 5,128 U.S. adults. It has a margin of error of 2 percentage points.

This trend will continue as long as it looks like our side is doing nothing. I hope the hearings start soon enough before the elections, & are dramatic enough to generate the enthusiasm that we are losing daily.

[hydrolastic]

11. +1

What is the problem DOJ ?

[FoxNewsSucks]

22. They need us to be more patient.

Apparently, we're still not patient enough. Never mind all the clearly open-and-shut crimes committed in plain sight, more patience is obviously required.

[BlueJac]

12. The DOJ super secret non investigation is going smoothly!

[gab13by13]

17. They are probably tying it in with the 81 day old criminal referral from the select committee.

Do I need the sarcasm thingy?

[czarjak]

4. "If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying" they mean it!

[dem4decades]

5. Meadows might as well be in charge of DOJ, he's untouchable, along with the rest of them.

How long will it take before all of this goes away and they all just fade into the background, only to rise up and take over again?

[durablend]

14. DOJ: "But then they won't kill us when they DO take over amiright?"

[FoxNewsSucks]

23. They may well think that.

I hope not. Bill Clinton thought that if he didn't go after them that they would do the same. Then we had "look forward not backward".

We all saw how that worked out. Hillary Clinton is still their favorite target.

[dem4decades]

28. DOJ didn't go after the bankers and they never hurt us after.

Except for crushing us. What bullshit

[msfiddlestix]

16. At this rate, give it another year... fade away like ghosts in an Ann Rice novel

these cretins continue breeding lunatics and installing them in positions of power.

nothing more to see here..

[spanone]

6. No consequences, no problem.

Meadows is a criminal on many levels, I doubt he'll pay a penny for any of it.

[JohnSJ]

7. He is white, a republican, and a racist. Nothing to see here

[gab13by13]

9. Just wondering if a Democratic Chief of Staff had done this,

if the MSM would have its pitch forks and torches out? Rhetorical question.

[Beastly Boy]

13. Will you be the first one to apologize if you are wrong?

So noted.

Oh, and define "nothing". It appears that the various applications of the term here on DU deviate significantly from its dictionary definition.

[gab13by13]

20. Our present DOJ,

has revealed zero investigation, I get it it doesn't have to, zero indictments for any politician, for any former politician, for a former president, for a former president's cabinet member, for a former advisor to the president. Nothing.

In 12 weeks Robert Mueller indicted or got guilty pleas from 34 people and 3 companies. Mueller also laid out the evidence to prosecute Trump for obstruction of justice. Mueller also laid out the evidence to convict Trump for campaign finance violations. Garland chose not to prosecute.

Garland also chose not to prosecute a bogus pro-Trump company that obtained access to ballots, voter information, election materials and equipment, all in violation of state and federal laws because they should have remained in the possession of election officials. Because DOJ failed to act, these fraudits have spread across the country. A private citizens group filed a FOIA request for the Cyber Ninjas to turn over documents and a judge granted that request. The bogus company has defied the court order, the judge the fined them tens of thousands of dollars a day for not complying. The bogus company that Merrick Garland failed to indict is just laughing, because it is a bogus company with a mail box for an office.

The definition of "nothing" can be ascertained from the Cyber Ninja and Mueller examples.

[FoxNewsSucks]

24. Because of that inaction, statutes of limitations are running out

so MF45 and cronies are indeed getting away with it. If the House changes in November, it all goes away.

Inaction. Another word meaning "nothing".

[gab13by13]

25. I know the statute of limitations to prosecute "individual one,"

which was a slam dunk case seeing as Michael Cohen went to jail and he just delivered the check signed by Trump has run out.

[Beastly Boy]

26. Our present DOJ

had also not revealed any indictments at all until late last year. That was how nothing was defined then, and it was pretty much in line with the dictionary definition. Then, October of last year, DOJ revealed indictments against 630 rioters. The definition of nothing promptly shifted, commensurate with the number of incoming indictments, to exclude them. By January 6 of this year, "nothing" amounted to 725 indictments. Then, on January 13, ten people were charged with seditious conspiracy - arguably the most serious charge applicable. They promptly fell into the "nothing" category.

None of the investigations leading to these indictments were revealed immediately. None of the future investigations can be expected to be revealed upon demand from the public. Your definition of "something" now stands at "any former politician, for a former president, for a former president's cabinet member, for a former advisor to the president.", and the rest amounts to "nothing". A far cry from the dictionary definition.

Now that we are done with "nothing", will you still be the first one to apologize if any categories of people you include in your most recent definition of "something" get indicted?

Oh, and take it easy counting the days since the Meadows referral. It is not healthy.

[Takket]

15. unless he magically wakes up tomorrow morning a black woman, he has nothing to worry about

[gab13by13]

21. That is exactly all that needs to be said.

[Fullduplexxx]

18. Oh well ... doesnt matter ... it's just another rich white man crime

For d.o.j. to ignore

[SledDriver]

19. No, silly

Voter fraud only applies to POC and/or people who don't vote RepubliQan.

[Mr. Ected]

27. I think you're wrong. His ass is still in deep shit.

Keeping a day count only twists your guts into knots. Maybe it'll be Day 87. Or Day 111. But he's going down as will the rest of these criminals and their cover-up team.