Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,823 posts)
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 04:08 PM Mar 2022

Biden Answered the 3 a.m. Call

Joe Biden hasn’t received the full credit he deserves for his statecraft during this crisis, because he has pursued a policy of self-effacement. Rather than touting his accomplishments in mobilizing a unified global response to the invasion, he has portrayed the stringent sanctions as the triumph of an alliance. By carefully limiting his own public role—and letting France’s Emmanuel Macron and Germany’s Olaf Scholz take turns as the lead faces of NATO—he has left Vladimir Putin with little opportunity to portray the conflict as a standoff with the United States, a narrative that the Russian leader would clearly prefer. He’s shown how to wield American leadership in the face of deep European ambivalence about its exercise.

His handling of the domestic politics of the crisis has been just as savvy. Although he could justifiably have portrayed Republicans as the party of Putin apologists, he refrained from dinging his political enemies. During his State of the Union address, he actively encouraged Republicans to feel as if they were his partners in a popular front.

This is surely redolent of the bipartisan foreign policy that Biden nostalgically yearns to revive. But it’s also an important tactic. By depoliticizing the issue, he has made it likely that Congress will quickly fund aid and arms for the Ukrainian military. And as gas prices spike, it will be rhetorically harder for Republicans to effectively pin the blame on him, because they have been fully supportive of sanctions.

Even as Biden has built a bipartisan consensus, he’s resisted pressure to pursue a more hawkish course. As a Democrat who lived through the 9/11 era, he remembers well how he and other leaders of his party adopted chest-thumping policies to defuse accusations of weakness. For decades, Democratic aspirants attempted to demonstrate their own steel in order to avoid evoking the politically fatal image of Michael Dukakis in a tank.




https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/03/biden-answered-3-am-call/626976/?utm_source=msn

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mitch96

(13,904 posts)
3. TFG would have allowed putin to just roll into Ukraine with no thought, recognition or fanfare.
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 04:23 PM
Mar 2022

It would have been forgotten iin the next news cycle..BUT that did not happen..
m

lame54

(35,290 posts)
4. Ukraine would have fought back either way...
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 04:29 PM
Mar 2022

Their odds would have been worse under Trump but
It would still be a hard road for Putin

WA-03 Democrat

(3,050 posts)
5. TFG would have been
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 04:34 PM
Mar 2022

the lead usher allowing them in. Remember he did not give the codes for Javelins to be used in combat. Joe did that.

captain queeg

(10,198 posts)
7. Along those lines: those screens the Russians installed on top their tank turrets haven't seemed to
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 07:19 PM
Mar 2022

work. I was conserved they might defeat the javelins.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden Answered the 3 a.m....