Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHopefully the tech described in this article has been perfected and is operational..
https://abcnews.go.com/US/us-successfully-intercepts-icbm-ship-launched-missile-historic/story?id=74248760In a first-of-its-kind test, the United States has successfully used a small, ship-fired missile to intercept a target Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), according to the Missile Defense Agency. The successful test shows the U.S. military now has another missile defense system capable of defending against North Korean ICBMs aimed at the United States.
This was in 2020. That particular test was with a system deployed from a navy ship. Apparently, we also have ground-based ones. Back then, the threat was possible North Korea launches of ICBMs.
Now, obviously North Korea, if they had ICBMs (I don't think they do, just medium range missiles) would be only a few of them. Russia can launch 6000 at a time.
If we have not ramped up since 2020, the current events may motivate the US to gear up. I do not know how many years it would take to have enough of these deployed and effectively have an iron dome neutering any saber rattling by Putin.
Nevertheless, its encouraging and it may mean that in the short to medium term (a generation?), ICBMS will be rendered useless.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 905 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hopefully the tech described in this article has been perfected and is operational.. (Original Post)
drray23
Mar 2022
OP
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)1. This would be an answer that would defang a large part of the...
nuclear threat. Not all of it, though.
Aside from other methods of nuclear holocaust that this doesn't affect, what happen to the nuclear detritus that falls from these intercepted missiles?
drray23
(7,627 posts)4. it's not really a concern.
Compared to being vaporized really. Mostly those ICBMs would be intercepted over water before they reach the land.
Woodswalker
(549 posts)2. So we blow up nukes in the air
Before they hit their intended targets. Hmmm, not sure how that's going to pan out.
drray23
(7,627 posts)3. just fine
nukes don't detonate if you blow them up. They detonate at a set altitude by means of a primary explosion to generate enough compression to produce critical mass .