General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTexas regulators seek punishment for pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Texas legal regulators have asked a judge to discipline attorney Sidney Powell for filing lawsuits they say were frivolous in support of former President Donald Trump's false claims of election fraud.
The disciplinary action is a major development in what has become a nationwide effort to punish pro-Trump lawyers who tried to overturn the November 2020 presidential election result, but is not a final finding of wrongdoing.
A Texas state court judge will hear the complaint and decide whether to impose a sanction and what that might be.
In the complaint made public on Tuesday, the State Bar of Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline said Powell "had no reasonable basis" for filing lawsuits challenging President Joe Biden's victories in key battleground states.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-regulators-seek-punishment-for-pro-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell/ar-AAUQasD
People are getting tired of her flashing her kraken.
no_hypocrisy
(46,088 posts)IbogaProject
(2,811 posts).
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,168 posts)This also makes me smile
Link to tweet
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/texas/article/Texas-State-Bar-complaint-moves-forward-against-16987171.php
The complaint was filed in July 2021 by the nonprofit Lawyers Defending American Democracy and 16 Texas lawyers, including four former presidents of the state Bar. It alleges that Paxton committed professional misconduct when he filed the December 2020 suit before the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to overturn the presidential election results in four battleground states. The complainants say the suit was frivolous, knowingly false and deceitful....
This is a big step because this rarely happens, said Jim Harrington, one of the Texas lawyers who joined the complaint and a retired founder of the Texas Civil Rights Project, a nonprofit that advocates for voting rights. I just know from being a lawyer for 50 years, this is very rare.......
Under the disciplinary rules, Paxton now has 20 days to decide whether to request the case be heard by a district court, where proceedings are public, or by an evidentiary panel. If he chooses the evidentiary panel, the proceedings will be kept private unless public sanctions are imposed. Dismissals or private sanctions are not made public.