Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
Thu Mar 10, 2022, 02:24 AM Mar 2022

The Vote.





Magnitsky Human Rights

Human Rights Accountability Act (Pub. L. 114-328, Title XII, Subtitle F) (“the Act”), which is implemented and built upon by Executive Order 13818 of December 20, 2017, “Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption” (E.O. 13818). The text of the report follows:

Pursuant to Section 1264 of the Act, and in accordance with E.O. 13818, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, submits this report to detail the Administration's implementation of the Act in 2020.

In 2020, the United States took significant action under the Global Magnitsky sanctions program (“Global Magnitsky”). As of December 10, 2020, the United States has designated 243 foreign persons (individuals and entities) pursuant to E.O. 13818. This sanctions program, which targets serious human rights abusers, corrupt actors, and their enablers, represents the best of the United States' values by taking impactful steps to protect and promote human rights and combat corruption around the world. Through the Act and E.O. 13818, the United States has sought to disrupt and deter serious human rights abuse and corruption abroad; promote accountability for those who act with impunity; and protect, promote, and enforce longstanding international norms alongside our partners and allies.

As the President outlined in his National Security Strategy (NSS), liberty, free enterprise, equal justice under the law, and the dignity of every human life are values that represent who we are as a people. Further, the NSS states we support with our words and actions those who live under oppressive regimes and seek freedom, individual dignity, and the rule of law. The NSS outlines a commitment to combat global corruption that facilitates transnational crime and terrorism and undermines economic growth. Through Global Magnitsky, the Administration is taking action to execute the President's vision as described in the NSS.

Actions taken in 2020 continue to demonstrate the reach, flexibility, and broad scope of the Global Magnitsky authorities. The United States responded to serious human rights abuses and corruption globally, addressing some of the most egregious behavior this tool can attempt to disrupt and deter. These actions targeted, among other things, serious human rights abusers affecting millions of members of Muslim minority groups in northwest China's Xinjiang province; corrupt actors in South Sudan involved in draining the country of critical resources; and Ugandan officials engaged in an adoption scam that victimized Ugandan-born children. These designations clearly demonstrate the resolve of the Administration to leverage this important tool, when appropriate, to target individuals and entities engaging in specified conduct.



https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/04/2020-29015/global-magnitsky-human-rights-accountability-act-annual-report

Bush and Omar voted nay. I want answers for their voting against Magnitsky Human Rights


The Vote.



Magnitsky Human Rights










WTF?
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Ocelot II

(115,674 posts)
2. Omar is my rep and I've had it with her.
Thu Mar 10, 2022, 02:27 AM
Mar 2022

A credible primary challenger, Don Samuels, announced his candidacy today, and I've already contributed to his campaign. I'm thinking of volunteering to work for him. Omar does very little for her district and apparently is more interested in taking positions that are controversial and stupid, maybe to get attention. She got mine, all right.

AlexSFCA

(6,137 posts)
6. she has to go! this vote cannot go unpunished
Thu Mar 10, 2022, 02:34 AM
Mar 2022

it really shows her true character but also lack of decency and common sense. Has she received any money from Russia? She might Jill Stein type of puppet.

Response to sheshe2 (Original post)

Ocelot II

(115,674 posts)
9. I don't think she's of the same ilk as Jill Stein and some other
Thu Mar 10, 2022, 02:44 AM
Mar 2022

ostensible progressives who support, or at least don't oppose, Putin. She's more of a contrarian who will oppose good legislation because she claims it's not progressive enough, or she resorts to whataboutism when a bill funds or supports a cause favored by Democrats but that in her opinion doesn't do enough for one of her pet causes.

brer cat

(24,559 posts)
7. It is appalling that anyone would vote against that
Thu Mar 10, 2022, 02:40 AM
Mar 2022

especially Democrats. I would love to see the "justification" for their opposition.

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
16. She didn't want sanctions that hurt the RU people, yet she called for sanctions against the people..
Thu Mar 10, 2022, 03:19 PM
Mar 2022

..the people of Israel not long ago.
She hadn't a second thought about hurting the innocents via Sanctions in that case.

So wha's the real reason?

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
20. This NO vote, that affected many other policies besides sanctions is why I will support her opponant
Thu Mar 10, 2022, 06:22 PM
Mar 2022

Both Omar & Bush are being challenged in the election & I will donate to & support their Democratic challengers.

They both voted against the all important VAWA. Violence Against Women Act revitalization.

There were more vital reasons to vote yes than there were to Vote NO.

I am done with both of them today.
This falls on the choice they both made.
And that is my right & my duty.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Vote.