General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUkrainian Armed Force officially confirms Russia's MG Andrey Kolesnikov, has been killed
Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦
@IAPonomarenko
·
1h
Ukraines authorities say MG Andrey Kolesnikov, Russias 29th Combined Arms Army commander has been killed.
This is yet to be confirmed!
Big if true the elimination of military leaders on the ground gets really catastrophic for Russia.
Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦
@IAPonomarenko
·
1h
The Ukrainian Armed Force officially confirms the general has been eliminated
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)More like this please.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)dalton99a
(81,468 posts)doc03
(35,328 posts)Generals being killed in my lifetime.
Let's send the Flynn brothers over there!
2Gingersnaps
(1,000 posts)ecstatic
(32,701 posts)Lithos
(26,403 posts)But, to your point, the difference is very noticeable. I would chalk it up not to the fact that US Generals lead from the rear - they tend to be up in touch with the troops, they are not having to spend their time acting as Captains, Majors and Colonels in driving and coordinating their troops. A huge difference in professionalism and skill between the US and Russian armies that exists at this time.
COL Mustard
(5,897 posts)The last I remember was Major General Harry Greene, killed in Afghanistan. I knew him and it was quite a loss.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... lines that they're exposed but RA flag officers don't have a choice cause they don't have proper communications.
These guys aren't easy to replace and lead whole officer units
Ray Bruns
(4,093 posts)getagrip_already
(14,742 posts)Or montgomery for that matter. And how many german commanders were kia?
The generals were creatures of the front lines and many were lost in combat. I think we even lost some in vietnam.
It isn't unusual in a historical context. It is unusual in modern warfare where commanders don't need to be on top of soldiers to issue orders or get reports. Of course none of that is working for russia right now.
Kaleva
(36,298 posts)The Russians may not have the rear areas totally secured and there could be UKR units operating freely there.
Sgent
(5,857 posts)is lack of Field Officers. Colonels are acting as Majors, Majors as Captains, Brigadiers as Colonels, you get the idea.
I heard on the radio (BBC) that the Allies (not just US) lost 12 in both theaters of war in WWII -- and the Russians have lost 3 in 2+ weeks. I don't know if that included my possibly favorite MoH winner, Brig. Theodore Roosevelt, Jr. who died a few days later from a heart attack after "starting the war from here" while directing the landing at Normandy.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)The Ukrainian intel game is super-strong.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Freaking amazing.
Beetwasher.
(2,971 posts)They've got eyes and ears up and down Russia's command chain, obviously.
Irish_Dem
(47,014 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Russia knocked out a lot of the cell phone towers, so now the encryption doesn't work and they have to use regular radios.
Russia shot itself in the hand and foot with one shot.
https://inews.co.uk/news/world/russian-troops-era-phone-system-ukraine-destroyed-4g-masts-1504149
COL Mustard
(5,897 posts)I'm sure they have (wink wink nod nod) super secret squirrel sources that we don't want people to know about.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)GregariousGroundhog
(7,521 posts)Andrei Sukhovetsky, Vitaly Gerasimov, and now Andrey Kolesnikov.
Note that Russian flag officers go Major General -> Lieutenant General -> Colonel General -> Army General whereas U.S. ones go Brigadier General -> Major General -> Lieutenant General -> General. So a Major General controls a brigade in the Russian Army, whereas they control a division in the United States Army.
The photo in the original post appears to be dated; it shows him wearing a colonel's insignia.
Jack from Charlotte
(2,367 posts)since a Lieutenant is a lower rank than Major. Originally the rank of Major General was Sergeant Major General and a Sergeant Major is a lower rank that Lieutenant.
Somewhere it got shortened to just Major General. Guessing the origin of American ranks came from The British Army.
Irish_Dem
(47,014 posts)I was an USAF brat and of course we knew the lower officer ranks, those were the ranks of our fathers. In those days base housing posted name and rank in front of your house.
We liked to name the ranks of general and we always argued about the Lt vs Maj Gen ranks. Which one was lower, which one higher.
We knew Major was higher than Lt so it didn't make sense to us and we thought the AF really screwed it up.
But yes as an adult yours is the correct explanation and yes I think it comes from the Brits.
GB_RN
(2,350 posts)According to the Wikipedia page on Russias Army ranks, what hes wearing in that photo are the everyday uniform Colonel epaulettes.
Irish_Dem
(47,014 posts)GB_RN
(2,350 posts)When you're used to them as flag officer rank devices. But, not everyone does things the same way. 🤷♂️
Irish_Dem
(47,014 posts)The field officer rank names. And then the shoulder boards.
We couldn't make heads or tails of them.
At least in some of the USN sub movies I like to watch, the officers are wearing rank insignia I recognize, same as USAF. Until they put on their dress whites, and then it is crazy again!
GB_RN
(2,350 posts)I personally think that all US military rank devices should be standardized across the board. If the navy wants to call a sergeant (E-5) a chief petty officer second class, fine. But IMO, the rank device should look the same. I have to look it up to tell the difference: CPO 2nd Class has 2 stripes, which looks like a corporals device.
Air Force is as bad the other way: 3 stripes is Senior Airman, E-4. Why should there be all the confusion and differences?
The justification of We do it this way because weve always done it this way or Because its tradition dont hold water with me. Simplification sometimes makes more sense (and can save a lot of money).
For the record, my grandfather started his service in the US Army Air Corps, so the enlisted rank devices were Army rank devices. He retired with the USAF proper, however.
Again, just my humble opinion and I dont expect anyone whos actually in charge will ever take up my idea. Lol
Irish_Dem
(47,014 posts)I think both military rank and insignia designations should be consistent across the board.
The US Navy, and the British Navy before them have been around a very long time, they won't change their traditions most likely.
I think the Navy should keep their uniforms. Best looking ones in the military service I think.
The AF enlisted insignia is a bit confusing at first. Yes there should be a system which insignia and nomenclature actually match.
My dad was career AF but when he entered it was US Army Air Corp like your father. My aunt has a picture of my Dad when he first joined during WWII and he is wearing an Army uniform. The kids got a kick out of that, which seemed so odd. We were used to AF blues.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Ukraine must have some damned good intel.
speak easy
(9,244 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)speak easy
(9,244 posts)The NATO rep was trying hard to contain his excitement over the Russian army's utter incompetence.
Botany
(70,501 posts)Russia has lost lots of Colonels and Generals so far.
getagrip_already
(14,742 posts)There is ittle command and control obvious. Each unit appears to be autonomous and out of communication with the whole.
That doesn't mean they are harmless. You can still cut down an oak tree with a bunch of steak knives. It just takes longer.
The Unmitigated Gall
(3,807 posts)Magomed Tushayev - Bloodstained Chechen psychopath
Vladimir Zhoga - Led neonazi Sparta brigade in Donbas
Andrei Sukhovetsky - Russian general?
Vitaliy Gerasimov - Russian general?
Andrey Kolesnikov - Russian general?
Mr. Evil
(2,841 posts)"Eliminated."
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
LOL, "Ukrainian SOF requests immediate tractor support"
Link to tweet
COL Mustard
(5,897 posts)Report to sector 5341 with tractors, code red!
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)AdamGG
(1,289 posts)I know Patton was out there directing the traffic of his tank brigades (at least George C. Scott was), but I thought in modern times, the top generals were in a room somewhere reviewing progress on large computer screens.
I wonder how much the CIA has informants embedded with the Russians who may tip off the Ukrainians to where these guys are. It's horrendous that the Russian invasion exists, but it is interesting news to follow.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)otherwise compromised from within perhaps.
AdamGG
(1,289 posts)Trump apparently didn't succeed at disabling them.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Chakaconcarne
(2,446 posts)IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)blue-wave
(4,352 posts)as painful to Pooty and Russia as you can. They started it, the Ukrainians will finish it. Slava Ukraini!!
COL Mustard
(5,897 posts)Is a very effective way to curtail its progress. Kill the generals, colonels and senior NCOs and everyone else will wallow around in confusion given the lack of command continuity.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)their encrypted phones are all 4G, and they've blown up cell towers, so their encrypted comms don't work.
denbot
(9,899 posts)Or their officer corps is riddled with dissent. This is getting curiouser, and curiouser..
prodigitalson
(2,410 posts)denbot
(9,899 posts)To get in small arms range of a flag officer more than once or twice in an entire campaign is exceptional. To off more than a half dozen flag officers in the space of two weeks with small arms demonstrate deep foundational cracks in the Russian armed forces.
That is far more devastating, and is foretelling a collapse. At that moment of collapse the world will hang in the balance, destinys dice in the hands of a soulless madman.