Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Supreme Court signals it may empower state legislatures to subvert elections
Republicans are pushing the independent state legislature doctrine, which would bolster unfettered gerrymandering and Trumps efforts to undercut democracy.
https://boltsmag.org/independent-state-legislature-doctrine/
The U.S. Supreme Court signaled on Monday that at least four justices are ready and willitheirng to bless a legal theory that was never really taken seriously until the 2020 elections. The so-called independent state legislature doctrine, if adopted, would provide new legal cover for Republicans to use their vast powers in states to subvert elections, shield aggressive gerrymanders, and restrict access to the vote in Democratic strongholds at the local level.
Their feverish idea is that state legislatures should have complete and unfettered control over how federal elections are run and regulated, shielded even from the oversight of state courts. Against the backdrop of efforts by President Donald Trumps supporters to reverse the last presidential election and prepare for the next one, the doctrine would give carte blanche to Republican-run legislatures in swing states like Georgia and Wisconsin, which the GOP has gerrymandered, to ensure it never loses.
In 2020, Texas and other Republican-led states implored the Supreme Court to block certification of the presidential election results in key states like Pennsylvania that Joe Biden won. They claimed that those states had flouted the Constitution and past legal precedents purportedly making it clear that a single branch of State governmentthat is, the state legislaturehas the authority to set the rules governing the appointment of presidential electors. Because executive and judicial officials made significant changes to the legislatively defined election laws in the Defendant States, Texas insisted, these states had violated the Constitutions Electors Clause and Elections Clause.
As Texas and its allied states see things, these clauses teach that only a states legislature may establish or modify the rules governing who elects the president and other federal offices. All other state non-legislative actors, like courts or election administrators, must abide by those rules. The Supreme Court rejected their plea at the time without opining on the merits. Weeks later, the Jan. 6 insurrection on the Capitol attempted by brute force what the justices wouldnt do through the force of law.
snip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 902 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Supreme Court signals it may empower state legislatures to subvert elections (Original Post)
Celerity
Mar 2022
OP
Alpeduez21
(1,751 posts)1. Fuck you Jill Stein and protest voters. Fuck you
I can never say this enough. VOTE THE GODDAMN DEMOCRATIC LINE! EVERY. FUCKING. TIME.
PortTack
(32,757 posts)2. Goes completely against the constitution! And says they are willing to ignore the will of the voter
Makes me literally sick to my stomach
They dont care.
They just want power.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)4. Cheating to win at all costs, by hook or by crook.
CrispyQ
(36,460 posts)5. "Republicans don't want to govern. They want to rule." -Molly Ivins -nt