Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grasswire2

(13,568 posts)
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 02:21 AM Mar 2022

So is Jamie Gorelick a verboten topic here?

Please tell me what the general thought is about her.

Yes, Ivanka's attorney.

Yes, got the Kushners their clearances.

There's more coming down the pike. But I thought I would test the water before posting.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So is Jamie Gorelick a verboten topic here? (Original Post) Grasswire2 Mar 2022 OP
, DURHAM D Mar 2022 #1
I had to google her Sur Zobra Mar 2022 #2
so what source did you find on google? nt Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #9
The first thing that came up was a short Sur Zobra Mar 2022 #13
Who? RockRaven Mar 2022 #3
Her closeness to Merrick Garland is being examined.. Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #10
she has a horrific overall track record Celerity Mar 2022 #4
I edited the Wikipedia article. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2022 #6
that article is very kind to her. /sarcasm Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #7
Why not just put out the guilt by association claim... Ohio Joe Mar 2022 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Scrivener7 Feb 2023 #16
TFG is posted here 24/7 so an unknown oughta be ok nt msongs Mar 2022 #5
except that her closeness to a Biden appointee is in the news.. nt Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #8
Alerting. Forbidden topic. maxsolomon Mar 2022 #12
If the plan is to insinuate that Merrick Grarland is bent because he knows her or what have you... Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #14
This Jaime Goerelick? Demsrule86 Mar 2022 #15
My head is spinning... I shouldn't be surprised, yet here I am scraping my jaw from the floor msfiddlestix Feb 2023 #17
 

Sur Zobra

(3,428 posts)
2. I had to google her
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 02:39 AM
Mar 2022

She is an attorney in private practice. Her political affiliation should have no affect on how she does her job, if she’s doing it right

 

Sur Zobra

(3,428 posts)
13. The first thing that came up was a short
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 02:27 PM
Mar 2022

blurb: she worked in the Clinton administration. After discovering this I thought you were wondering if she could defend Ivanka properly because they each belonged to different political parties.

This is all I looked at via google. I’m assuming that one must know much, much more about Gorelick in order to understand your post’s intent

Grasswire2

(13,568 posts)
10. Her closeness to Merrick Garland is being examined..
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 02:01 PM
Mar 2022

....as his mentor throughout his career and as a close friend.

Celerity

(43,333 posts)
4. she has a horrific overall track record
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 02:58 AM
Mar 2022
anti-privacy

actively fought student loan reforms as a lobbyist

was a lobbyist for Big Pharma and helped weaken opioid drug oversight enforcement

Jared-Ivanka “Ethics” Lawyer Helped Pharma Weaken Opioid Enforcement

https://www.republicreport.org/2017/jared-ivanka-ethics-lawyer-helped-pharma-weaken-opioid-enforcement/




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamie_Gorelick

Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)

Even though she had no previous training nor experience in finance, Gorelick was appointed Vice Chairman of Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) from 1997 to 2003. She served alongside former Clinton Administration official Franklin Raines. During that period, Fannie Mae developed a $10 billion accounting scandal.

On March 25, 2002, Business Week interviewed Gorelick about the health of Fannie Mae. Gorelick is quoted as saying, "We believe we are managed safely. We are very pleased that Moody's gave us an A-minus in the area of bank financial strength – without a reference to the government in any way. Fannie Mae is among the handful of top-quality institutions." One year later, government regulators accused Fannie Mae of improper accounting "to the tune of $9 billion" in unrecorded losses.

In an additional scandal concerning falsified financial transactions that helped the company meet earnings targets for 1998, a "manipulation" that triggered multimillion-dollar bonuses for top executives, Gorelick received $779,625.

A 2006 report of an investigation by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight into Fannie Mae's accounting practices and corporate governance revealed that from 1998 to 2002 Gorelick received a total of $26.5 million in income from Fannie Mae.


9/11 Commission

According to Gorelick's op-ed letter in the Washington Post she states that: "At last week's hearing, Attorney General John Ashcroft, facing criticism, asserted that 'the single greatest structural cause for September 11 was the wall that segregated criminal investigators and intelligence agents' and that I built that wall through a March 1995 memo." However, the report from the 9/11 Commission, co-authored by Gorelick, asserts that the 'wall' limiting the ability of federal agencies to cooperate had existed since the 1980s and is in fact not one singular wall but a series of restrictions created over the course of over twenty years.

Conflict of interest

A 1995 Department of Justice memorandum states that the procedures her memorandum put in place for the investigation of the 1993 WTC bombing "go beyond what is legally required...[to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation." The wall intentionally exceeded the requirements of FISA (the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978) for the purposes of criminal investigations, as well as the then-existing federal case law. These rules were, shortly after their creation, expanded to regulate such communications in future counter-terrorism investigations.

Gorelick eventually recused herself from reviewing her own role in the regulation of information about terrorist activities.


Lawyer for Duke University

Gorelick was added in February 2006 to Duke University's defense team after the 2006 Duke University lacrosse case scandal. The University faced claims by unaccused members of the team that they "railroaded 47 Duke University students as either principals or accomplices." Gorelick and her law firm left the defense team in July 2011 after Judge Beatty denied Duke's motions to dismiss and let the lawsuits proceed in April.



Jamie Gorelick: Amazon's Anti-Union Shadow Adviser At The DOJ


https://therevolvingdoorproject.org/jamie-gorelick-amazons-anti-union-shadow-adviser-at-the-doj/


Ivanka and Jared’s Ethics Lawyer Somehow Wins Ethics Award

https://www.republicreport.org/2017/ivanka-jareds-ethics-lawyer-somehow-wins-ethics-award/

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,414 posts)
6. I edited the Wikipedia article.
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 06:42 AM
Mar 2022

Was:

Gorelick was added in February 2006 to Duke University's defense team after the 2006 Duke University lacrosse case scandal.

Now:

Gorelick was added in February 2008 to Duke University's defense team after the 2006 Duke University lacrosse case scandal.

Grasswire2

(13,568 posts)
7. that article is very kind to her. /sarcasm
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 01:56 PM
Mar 2022

From my google last night, I was astounded to read her record. Topped off by being the ethics lawyer for the Kushners.

Here's the problem right now, though.

She was Merrick Garland's close MENTOR and remains a very close friend.

Whether it's fair or not to link them, the story is out there now.

So be prepared, Garland defenders.

Many people consider her responsible for 9/11 by imposing the wall between criminal and intelligence divisions of FBI. Many people consider her role in Fannie Mae something that was destructive to Americans' interests. She earned $26M for her work there. And that's just the beginning.

I will not post links to any of this, Garland having been appointed by a Democratic president.

But it's out there.

Ohio Joe

(21,755 posts)
11. Why not just put out the guilt by association claim...
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 02:05 PM
Mar 2022

The innuendo is clear, let’s see the facts.

Response to Celerity (Reply #4)

Demsrule86

(68,555 posts)
14. If the plan is to insinuate that Merrick Grarland is bent because he knows her or what have you...
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 02:31 PM
Mar 2022

yeah you should not post that here...why help the pukes...consider who wins if Merrick Garland is destroyed? The Pukes And for fucks' sake how is that helpful.

Demsrule86

(68,555 posts)
15. This Jaime Goerelick?
Sat Mar 12, 2022, 02:40 PM
Mar 2022

'Jamie S. Gorelick is an American lawyer who served as the Deputy Attorney General of the United States from 1994 to 1997, during the Clinton administration.
‎Early life · ‎Federal National Mortgage....' She was also on the board of Amazon.

Yeah, I found the article and think you should delete this post...she has worked in government and then a big law firm...you don't like some of her clients...however. That is what lawyers do...so this is really an attempt to smear Garland and Biden. She is a personal friend of Garland. They have probably known each other for years...and who the fuck cares. Garland is the only game in town and I don't know how it ends. But I have confidence in Joe Biden who appointed Garland. Thus I suggest you take a step back with these sorts of accusations which will only hurt outside and really are pretty pointless.

msfiddlestix

(7,281 posts)
17. My head is spinning... I shouldn't be surprised, yet here I am scraping my jaw from the floor
Sat Feb 25, 2023, 09:57 AM
Feb 2023

Her name seemed vaguely familiar., I felt like maybe from 9/11 Truth Commission days. But memory on the deets and characters from those hearings are rather blurred these days except the main players.

I didn't recall her as Clinton's Assistant Attorney General. And she was Ivanka and Jarrods "Ethics Lawyer". in 2017, My memory of Ivanka's ethics issues on day 2 of tfg's reign of terror is quite vivid.

astounding. no words can adequately express my feelings and thoughts right now. but thanks for enlightening us.

.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So is Jamie Gorelick a ve...