General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat's Putin doing? My theory for the day.
This is just opinion. Opinions may and certainly DO vary.
My own opinion changes frequently but here's where I'm at today.
I think Kiev is a head fake. Kiev is the shiny object that draws the most cameras and defenders. The Russians are establishing light groups around Ukraine, not for an assault but to tie the defenders down and create chaos.
Look at the actual fighting. Kherson, Mykolaiv, Melitopol, Mariupol, Berdyansk...
What do they have in common? They're all located between the Russian leaning LPR/DPR and Crimea.
IMHO, the Russians are looking to grab the land from LPR/DPR all the way to Kherson in the West and Zaporizhzhia in the North, encompassing all the coast along the Sea of Azov.
This gives the Russians control over the Eastern breakaway provinces, the nuclear plant at Zaporizhzhia, a land bridge to Crimea, full control of the Sea of Azov.
When the Russians have consolidated the Southeast, they will "threaten" sufficiently to push Zelenskyy to accept a negotiation ceding the land lost in the Southeast to Russia while a literal gun is pointed at Kiev.
Summary: Kiev isn't the strategic target, the Southeast IS. It's a land grab. How long will Zelenskyy fight? Will he negotiate?
Even without negotiation, Russia just annexes the Southeast just like they did Crimea then withdraws from the North and Kiev.
We will see but those are my thoughts on what I THINK the Russians are attempting.
underpants
(182,603 posts)I think the land bridge to Crimea is important but their advances there might be because its within reach of logistics.
WarGamer
(12,354 posts)They're there to tie down the defenders. They will threaten Kiev but only as a "hostage" to force negotiation.
I also think Zelenskyy survives all of this and joins the EU within the decade.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)and the city most likely to side with the Russians in any conflict. The fact that it hasn't, and has hardened its opposition is bad news for the Russians.
Even if Putin declares victory and is able to secure Mariupol and his 'land bridge', he's going to face the insurgency of insurgencies for years. There's going to be a shitload of dead Russians in those provinces, and given the details of the conflict, I'd start to question the loyalties of people there.
WarGamer
(12,354 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,387 posts)NCDem47
(2,248 posts)Needs to be made EU and NATO and a major DMZ established on the border with Russia and Belarus. Go all Korea on this border!
Eliot Rosewater
(31,106 posts)WarGamer
(12,354 posts)LakeArenal
(28,802 posts)I agree that Ukraine is a diversionary tactic.
But I didnt have an idea what his real objective is.
Thanks for the thoughtful post.
Its sad that you have to explain here now what an opinion is.
WarGamer
(12,354 posts)Walleye
(30,977 posts)WarGamer
(12,354 posts)Walleye
(30,977 posts)Remember when Pompeo said that Americans dont care about Ukraine and asked a senior foreign affairs reporter if she could find it on a map? Insult.And for all the people who make fun of Kamala Harris laughing, its nothing compared to Pompeos creepy giggling and chuckling every time he talks about killing and destroying
anarch
(6,535 posts)and Putler's mind has been warped from too much interaction with it.
Walleye
(30,977 posts)2naSalit
(86,323 posts)Is only a component of the entire goal. But I wouldn't be surprised to find it would be considered a consolation prize at some point by pootine.
What I hope is that all of Ukraine, as of 2005 (?), would be restored so that Russia is kicked out of Crimea and the Donbas.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)WarGamer
(12,354 posts)Even if Russia withdraws from Ukraine but annexes the Southeast, Ukraine is left with a lot of destruction.
I think Russia has learned that in 21st Century combat, they have no chance facing NATO on the field of battle.
I guess it'd be a win if Ukraine (whats left of it) is greeted to the EU and possibly NATO... gets rebuilt nicely and Zelenskyy is their leader.
I don't think we'll see aggressive war from Russia for quite a long time after this... in fact I think Russia has a new and moderate leader within the next 5-ish years.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)peggysue2
(10,823 posts)As reasonable as anything else I've read and also matches Putin's incursions into former Soviet countries by grabbing land at the edges. An established land bridge would also provide Putin a way to a victorious withdraw, rather than the disastrous, costly screwup that's unfolded.
Of course, the whole invasion is illegal, amoral. Putin is a war criminal regardless. But that doesn't appear to bother the man as long as he gets what he wants.
WarGamer
(12,354 posts)And if the casualty figures are accurate... what a terrible human price.
Nevilledog
(51,006 posts)WarGamer
(12,354 posts)Only a few million maps and documents to change because every English language map has KIEV for what, several hundred years?
Funny side story.
My name doesn't exist in Russian. So my travel documents always had the "phonetic" spelling of my name.
Yes I've been to Russia 2x because my former employer has relationships there (mid 00's)
Doc Sportello
(7,486 posts)I hope you are right for one reason. That scenario seems to be one in which there would be much less loss of life than the one that is going on now.
Also, the POS could claim that was his intention all along and pretend it wasn't the clusterfuck that it is.
maxsolomon
(33,244 posts)Everything the Communists "gave" to the Ukraine Socialist Republic last century:
I think he will take Odesa as well - the entire coast.
WarGamer
(12,354 posts)In fact, thinking back to Putins speech after the invasion, referencing Lenin giving away land... this is it.
You've added the context that gives me more confidence in my theory.
bluestarone
(16,859 posts)He wants him DEAD! (one of his biggest objectives i think)
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)I think Pootie really wants all of Europe, for starters.
But you are likely quite correct about his near-term goal.
WarGamer
(12,354 posts)The Russian Military will leave Ukraine, humiliated and neutered.
And I think Russia sees a new and moderate leader in the next few years.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)"The Russian Military will leave Ukraine humiliated and neutered."
says the exact opposite of:
"The Russian Military will leave Ukraine, humiliated and neutered."
WarGamer
(12,354 posts)JHB
(37,154 posts)The initial goal of Kyiv was to decapitate the Ukrainian government and install a puppet. While he wasn't able to just sweep in as planned, it's still important for him to disable it, for practical and symbolic reasons.
Also keep in mind that even early on, an apparent goal was seizing the entire Black Sea coastline and turning any remnant Free Ukraine into a land-locked state.
The current fighting is consistent with those scenarios, without any "head fakes".