Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BigmanPigman

(51,591 posts)
Wed Mar 16, 2022, 07:08 PM Mar 2022

Question: Are the weapons being sent to Ukraine equal to providing a No Fly Zone?

I don't know anything about military issues and weapons so I am asking in good faith. Since the US and NATO won't provide a No Fly Zone do the new weapons have the ability to do what a No Fly Zone would?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question: Are the weapons being sent to Ukraine equal to providing a No Fly Zone? (Original Post) BigmanPigman Mar 2022 OP
A no-fly zone would involve American pilots shooting down Russian planes. Not the same. Walleye Mar 2022 #1
It would also involve striking ground-based anti-aircraft weapons Ocelot II Mar 2022 #2
No they are not the same. brooklynite Mar 2022 #3
If they can keep the Russians from flying over Ukraine, then yes... COL Mustard Mar 2022 #4
Watch this video from the 40 minute mark... orwell Mar 2022 #5
That was very helpful, thanks!!! BigmanPigman Mar 2022 #6

Walleye

(31,022 posts)
1. A no-fly zone would involve American pilots shooting down Russian planes. Not the same.
Wed Mar 16, 2022, 07:10 PM
Mar 2022

But to answer your question I think that they are intended to provide air security by shooting down planes and missiles from the ground

Ocelot II

(115,693 posts)
2. It would also involve striking ground-based anti-aircraft weapons
Wed Mar 16, 2022, 07:19 PM
Mar 2022

located within Russia and Belarus. If you create a no-fly zone (more accurately called a combat air patrol) you also have to be able to protect it, which would mean not only shooting down Russian planes within Ukrainian airspace, but also taking out the ground-based weapons that are targeting US/NATO aircraft, some of which will be in Russian territory.

COL Mustard

(5,897 posts)
4. If they can keep the Russians from flying over Ukraine, then yes...
Wed Mar 16, 2022, 07:33 PM
Mar 2022

Essentially the same thing. As I understand US and NATO policy, we aren't going to widen the war by our direct involvement. There is no way we put US or NATO pilots in harm's way like that, when the Russians have already shown that they can strike most parts of Ukraine from Russian airspace, as they did over the weekend. In order to stop that type of attack, we would have to shoot down their planes in their airspace...a clear casus belli from their POV. However, if we're giving the Ukrainians the capability to shoot down Russian aircraft over Ukraine from the ground, then we don't have to put ourselves in that position. S-300s are a pretty potent air defense weapon, and Stingers can do the SHORAD mission well...they've been proven for a long time.

orwell

(7,773 posts)
5. Watch this video from the 40 minute mark...
Wed Mar 16, 2022, 07:35 PM
Mar 2022

...it will answer the question about what is a No Fly Zone.

It will also tell you why setting up a no fly zone would benefit Putler.

&t=2471s
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question: Are the weapons...