Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
Wed Mar 16, 2022, 10:26 PM Mar 2022

Good news! Three-judge federal court DISMISSES Republican "Elections Clause" claim in Pennsylvania

🚨BREAKING: Three-judge federal court DISMISSES Republican "Elections Clause" claim in Pennsylvania redistricting case.

Another big win for the
@EliasLawGroup
team and
@RedistrictFdn
. GOP keeps its redistricting losing streak alive.





https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylvania-at-large-congressional-elections/

Pennsylvania At-Large Congressional Elections

Lawsuit filed on behalf of four Republicans — including a candidate for Congress and a member of the Susquehanna County Board of Elections — challenging the state court system’s ability to draw new districts after the Legislature failed to do so. The plaintiffs claim that state legislatures are the sole governmental body tasked with redistricting and “any attempt by the state judiciary to usurp the legislature’s constitutionally assigned role must be disregarded by state officials.” Therefore, the plaintiffs argue that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which has already taken over redistricting in the state after an impasse, cannot draw new maps. The lawsuit alleges that “any map imposed by the state supreme court would be flatly unconstitutional” and the only remedy, unless the General Assembly adopts new maps, is for Pennsylvania to hold at-large elections for congressional members in 2022. After the Pennsylvania Supreme Court adopted a new congressional map following impasse litigation in Carter v. Chapman, the plaintiffs in this lawsuit sought emergency relief from the U.S. Supreme Court blocking the new map. They argued that the state Supreme Court cannot be involved in congressional redistricting. The Supreme Court denied the petition. Litigation before a three-judge panel is ongoing, but the plaintiffs will not be seeking relief for the 2022 election cycle.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good news! Three-judge federal court DISMISSES Republican "Elections Clause" claim in Pennsylvania (Original Post) herding cats Mar 2022 OP
Works for me! I'm in PA. dchill Mar 2022 #1
He really is! herding cats Mar 2022 #2
...one trumpy lawsuit at a time. dchill Mar 2022 #4
Yes, & Marc Elias is Genius! Cha Mar 2022 #5
:) His team have the legal principles and body of law on their side. Hortensis Mar 2022 #9
We Needed Some!! Rt💕🐱‍🏍TY Cat! Cha Mar 2022 #3
That we did! herding cats Mar 2022 #6
Oh Yes.. and we've(Democracy) Cha Mar 2022 #7
Who is surprised by this? LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2022 #8

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. :) His team have the legal principles and body of law on their side.
Thu Mar 17, 2022, 03:04 AM
Mar 2022

That is to say, the American people do. Applause for all those who came before us for making this a nation of laws. And for all of us who are the protectors of the law and of government of, by, and for the people.


Cha

(297,188 posts)
7. Oh Yes.. and we've(Democracy)
Wed Mar 16, 2022, 11:28 PM
Mar 2022
been Lucky with Marc Elias and the Federal Judges!

May it keep on Course!

💙💛
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Good news! Three-judge fe...