Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGood news! Three-judge federal court DISMISSES Republican "Elections Clause" claim in Pennsylvania
🚨BREAKING: Three-judge federal court DISMISSES Republican "Elections Clause" claim in Pennsylvania redistricting case.
Another big win for the
@EliasLawGroup
team and
@RedistrictFdn
. GOP keeps its redistricting losing streak alive.
Another big win for the
@EliasLawGroup
team and
@RedistrictFdn
. GOP keeps its redistricting losing streak alive.
Link to tweet
https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylvania-at-large-congressional-elections/
Pennsylvania At-Large Congressional Elections
Lawsuit filed on behalf of four Republicans including a candidate for Congress and a member of the Susquehanna County Board of Elections challenging the state court systems ability to draw new districts after the Legislature failed to do so. The plaintiffs claim that state legislatures are the sole governmental body tasked with redistricting and any attempt by the state judiciary to usurp the legislatures constitutionally assigned role must be disregarded by state officials. Therefore, the plaintiffs argue that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which has already taken over redistricting in the state after an impasse, cannot draw new maps. The lawsuit alleges that any map imposed by the state supreme court would be flatly unconstitutional and the only remedy, unless the General Assembly adopts new maps, is for Pennsylvania to hold at-large elections for congressional members in 2022. After the Pennsylvania Supreme Court adopted a new congressional map following impasse litigation in Carter v. Chapman, the plaintiffs in this lawsuit sought emergency relief from the U.S. Supreme Court blocking the new map. They argued that the state Supreme Court cannot be involved in congressional redistricting. The Supreme Court denied the petition. Litigation before a three-judge panel is ongoing, but the plaintiffs will not be seeking relief for the 2022 election cycle.
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Good news! Three-judge federal court DISMISSES Republican "Elections Clause" claim in Pennsylvania (Original Post)
herding cats
Mar 2022
OP
dchill
(42,291 posts)1. Works for me! I'm in PA.
Marc Elias is a lawyering god.
herding cats
(19,689 posts)2. He really is!
He's saving our democracy!
dchill
(42,291 posts)4. ...one trumpy lawsuit at a time.
Cha
(310,510 posts)5. Yes, & Marc Elias is Genius!




Hortensis
(58,785 posts)9. :) His team have the legal principles and body of law on their side.
That is to say, the American people do. Applause for all those who came before us for making this a nation of laws. And for all of us who are the protectors of the law and of government of, by, and for the people.
Cha
(310,510 posts)3. We Needed Some!! Rt💕🐱🏍TY Cat!




herding cats
(19,689 posts)6. That we did!
This is so important to our country's future.
Cha
(310,510 posts)7. Oh Yes.. and we've(Democracy)
been Lucky with Marc Elias and the Federal Judges!
May it keep on Course!
💙💛

May it keep on Course!





LetMyPeopleVote
(162,850 posts)8. Who is surprised by this?
This lawsuit was very very stupid