General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn hypothesis possibly explaining why the Senate passed permanent Daylight Saving Time.
Permanent Daylight Saving Time has special appeal to farmers, whom generally need daylight to do their farming.
Farmers tend to be concentrated in states where there are low populations and lots of farmland.
The 21 least populated states have a combined population of a little over 37 million people who are collectively represented by 42 U.S. senators.
California has a population of over 39.5 million people who are represented by 2 U.S. senators.
So maybe the House of Representatives, who more evenly represent the population, will stop this idea in its tracks.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)They get up when the sun comes up.
Daylight savings time has nothing to do with farmers and never did.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Factory farms aside a large percentage of family farmers today have day jobs and that hour of daylight when you get back to the farm is golden.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)It was started by Kaiser Wilhelm as a fuel saving measure in WWI
Cows dont care what a clock says.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)And I'm very familiar with cows. But to say DST doesn't benefit farmers is ill informed.
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)So the corporate pigs foist it upon us to make more money.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/qz.com/1120488/daylight-saving-time-as-americans-know-it-was-instituted-by-corporate-lobbies-not-farmers/amp/
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)In fact, it turns out that we don't actually change the amount of daylight with legislation.
Learn something every day!
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)You are correct it is very good for farmers of which I am one. But there are 50 democrats in the Senate and most of them do not represent "low population" states... including the 2 from California.
UTUSN
(70,683 posts)Instead of the much needed social programs included in the BBB we get the booby prize.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)AZProgressive
(29,322 posts)I read that changing times is bad for the health.
Tree Lady
(11,451 posts)And takes me awhile to set back to normal. I bet many have this problem.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Critics of daylight saving time say the practice is outdated. Many scientists say it's also dangerous at least around the time when clocks "spring forward" and rob most of the population an hour of precious sleep.
The risk of having a stroke goes up 8 percent during the first two days after the beginning of daylight saving time, according to one Finnish study.
In Sweden, researchers found an average 6.7 percent greater risk of heart attack in the three days after the spring change. Inspired by that finding, a group of U.S. researchers conducted their own study and determined that heart attack risk jumped 24 percent the Monday after switching over to daylight saving time. That risk then tapered off over the remainder of the week.
By contrast, risk for heart attack dropped 21 percent on the Tuesday after the fall time change.
doc03
(35,325 posts)shift work 40 years.
AZProgressive
(29,322 posts)I cant copy & paste but the change can lead to higher rates of heart attacks, strokes, and traffic accidents.
https://www.webmd.com/sleep-disorders/news/20211105/harmful-effects-of-daylight-savings
I also see links that say permanent DST can be bad for your health as well.
doc03
(35,325 posts)AZProgressive
(29,322 posts)Why Ditching Daylight Saving Time Would Be Healthier for Everyone
(Snip)
Dr. Susheel Patil, a clinical associate professor at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine who specializes in sleep medicine, said the time changes associated with daylight saving time typically cause us to lose sleep for about 1 week until we adapt to the change.
While we are going through this adjustment period, however, it can put our health and safety at risk.
The loss of sleep has been shown to result in an increase in car accidents during the week after the change to DST, and there can be an approximately 20 percent increase in patient safety-related incidents associated with human error, said Patil.
In addition, DST has been linked to an increase in heart-related issues such as the acute occurrence of heart attacks, stroke, and atrial fibrillation, he said.
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-ditching-daylight-saving-time-would-be-healthier-for-everyone#How-daylight-saving-time-affects-health-and-safety
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)and winter...I wake in the dark, drive to work in the dark, and drive home in the dark...it sucks.
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)and everything else should be done through scheduling. Its too weird and non logical to permanently label noon as 1:00PM.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)ZZenith
(4,121 posts)65% of the year, in fact.
Longer evenings in the summertime when the weather is nicer makes way more sense.
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)But permanently decoupling noon from 12:00 just rubs me the wrong way because its just wrong. (Although pretty low on the scale of Things to Worry About of course)
ZZenith
(4,121 posts)Solar midnight and solar noon only coincide with actual midnight and actual noon in a relatively small part of the world so its largely just semantics.
I know of very few people who benefit from a 4:30am sunrise in the summer and a great many who benefit from a 9:30pm sunset.
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)I think the problem is that DST is a darn good idea, except in winter, when it doesnt really make sense to get a jump on the day when its not even daytime yet. There is just no way to have ones cake and eat it too with one schedule for the whole year. The schedule must shift for optimal placement of the work period during the day as the seasons shift.
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)If you assume an average of 8 hours of sleep and 16 hours of awake, the logical flow would be to sleep from 8 PM to 4 AM and being awake from 4 AM to 8 PM. Peoples midday I always skewed by 2-3 hours.
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)does seem strange that the day should start at midnight though - shouldnt it start at dawn =00:00 - then the zenith (what we call noon) would be 0600, sunset would be 1200 and midnight would be 1800 - (using miltary time to avoid confusion)
I think if you are right on the center line of a time zone, then the sun is at zenith at noon (discounting the analemma effect which moves it slightly east and west throughout the year)
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)Most people aren't at the centerline of a time zone, and the zenith of the sun is only relevant if you want to maximize sun hours which is not the way we live our lives.
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)reasons for me. Because if we arent going to change the clock anymore, then lets just say what we really want which is to get a jump on the day so we can quit earlier. The workday would then be 8-4, clock stays on Standard, all is harmonious again. But saying noon is 1:00PM forever is just plain weird.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)Most of Western Europe 1 hour ahead of GMT, even though Spain and France are due south of the UK. China is all one huge time zone. Check out a time zone map, and there are all sorts of weird expansions and contractions to time zones, based on political or cultural boundaries.
As long as everyone agrees on a standard, it doesn't really matter where the sun is at noon.
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)since its not going to change anymore it doesnt really matter. 8 to 4 instead of 9 to 5. Otherwise we have redefined what the role of the clock is which is to tell us roughly where the sun is. Your right though, it is all arbitrary.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)I disagree.
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)that is all it is anyway - we want to get a jump on the day to quit earlier. So define the new working hours as 8-4 and voila - permanent DST without decoupling the clock from the sun. ie - noon would still be 12:00 along the centerlines of the time zones.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)PSPS
(13,591 posts)They did the same 50 years ago and it was undone two years later because people "found out" they hated it. The squawking will begin as soon as the first kid gets hit by a car on the way to school.
Walleye
(31,008 posts)doc03
(35,325 posts)The kids I see are sitting in a warm car with mom at the end of the driveway waiting for the bus.
everyonematters
(3,433 posts)Keeping it at one or the other will save manhours.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)I had a device that came out just before they messed with it the last time. That device then had the wrong time for months out of every year.
doc03
(35,325 posts)f---g hour not the end of the world.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)It gets dark at 4;30...the kids can't even play outside after school. We have snow and ice often on our commutes so it makes a difference to us in places like Ohio.
doc03
(35,325 posts)of 430 pm you will have an extra hour of light after work. I live in Ohio too I am retired now but in the winter I would go to work in the dark and come home in the dark. Some of these folks talk like moving the clock one hour is going to cause us to die. Let them work shift work for 40 years and then they can talk.
It is f--g crazy people in the USA worried about one hour a year killing people. The same time people in Ukraine are dying
for the freedoms we have.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)And, what about the effect of changing the time on the Moon?
Maybe we should return to the way time was handled in Biblical times. (Science and Technology has really knotted this issue.)
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)twice a year .
betsuni
(25,472 posts)birds noisy, I think it's time to get up and look at the clock. 4:30.
THAT messes with one's sleep, not one hour change twice a year, as far as I'm concerned. I like DST because brighter evenings are better than brighter hotter mornings and it doesn't matter, the daylight gets longer half the year and the other half shorter. I prefer the darker cooler half.
My clock stopped at 10:30 this morning and I finally realized that couldn't be right and checked, it was noon. The way some people talk, I think I should be freaked out, like maybe not knowing the right time for an hour and a half ruined my rhythms or glands and I'm going to die in an accident or something.
Sympthsical
(9,072 posts)That's . . . a choice.
betsuni
(25,472 posts)That's ... a choice.
canetoad
(17,152 posts)I don't really like daylight savings time.
I've long thought that it is a measure of most benefit to small businesses, bars, cafes etc that make their money on lingering evenings. If this decision is to benefit these businesses, I'm all for it. After Covid they need a boost to get going again.
haele
(12,647 posts)From work, school, or after dinner.
Daylight Savings Time subconsciously encourages people to stay out later as it gets warmer, which means more time for spending on "entertainment".
Especially the further north you go; I remember a few midsummer summer months in Seattle where sunset was at 9:15/9:30 and we would take long family walks after dinner because we couldn't just afford to go out and go out for ice cream or a movie like many of the other families in our neighborhood did on those evenings where it was just a bit too hot (before AC) to stay inside and read or play for another three hours before it was cool enough to go to bed.
People don't do much late in the cold, dark months. But they do a lot more in warmer months.
Haele
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)It wasnt a narrow vote where low population States made the difference e.