General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWar is stupid, and Putin is in fact a war criminal. But how does the military industrial complex
feel about it all?
Well, I'll tell you.
If we want the world peace Zelinsky spoke of yesterday morning, then we need to force changes in corporate charters away from shareholder primacy to a stakeholder approach. For those of you who have read my little soapbox on this before, bear with me.
In 1919, the Dodge Brothers, who were shareholders in Ford Motor Company sued Henry Ford on the basis that raising the wages of his factory workers to the point where they could afford to buy the cars they produced deprived them of profits to which they were 'entitled' as shareholders. They WON that suit in a Michigan Supreme Court ruling and the doctrine of Shareholder Primacy was born.
It has hardened since then, to the point where 'the market' rewards CEOS who engage in sociopathic behavior. We often get called 'snowflakes' when we say our system holds profits over people, but this is a true statement. Profit is king, and people are nothing. Every. Single. Time.
Think - if you are CEO of a publicly held company, the first thing you're going to do is bust the union. Then, you will drive wages and benefits down, and steal the pension fund if you can. You will compromise on worker safety and cut costs at the expense of good working conditions.
You will downsize the packaging of your products and charge the same amount. If people are hurt by your product sometimes, you will decide, based on shareholder profits, if it is more 'cost effective' to just pay the claims of the people who are maimed or killed from your product, versus recalling the product and fixing the problem. Seriously. Most of you can cite at least several examples of this behavior off the top of your heads.
And the environment? LOL. You will foul it whenever you can get away with it, and if you get caught, or screw up in some other way, you will run to the 'gummint' for a bailout at the expense of taxpayers, but you'll pocket any and all profits. You won't pay any taxes, either, if you can find loopholes. Corporations only pay in 6.8% of the government's tax revenue, while individual taxpayers foot 86% of the bill. This is how you want it.
Finally, you will fund campaigns for as many Republican legislators as you can, because what could be a better investment in keeping this policy just the way you like it? You will also 'earn' millions per year because of a tax loophole that allows corporations to deduct much of your 'compensation.'
THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE NOW, PEOPLE. It is.
And until we force changes to corporate charters to a stakeholder approach that holds workers, consumers and the environment on an equal footing with shareholders, we will continue to have the problems we do. And the corruption we have.
I know this is an esoteric point, or so you may think. You may believe the average 'Murikan cannot understand such a complicated thing, and that's just what the oligarchs want you to continue thinking.
I say this because we have a military industrial complex (MIC) that is driven VERY MUCH by shareholder profits, with patriotism a distant second place. This MIC will NEVER, EVER allow the UN to have the power it should have, or allow Zelinsky's world peace organization to form. It would, after all, be BAD for PROFITS.
Magoo48
(4,660 posts)The US and world MIC cares not a sliver for peace. Greed is a myopic, mental-madness. The lust for profits is all consuming. Their parasitic tendrils are buried deep into social and political fabric of every arms manufacturing nation. Talk of any kind of universal peace is a threat to them.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)and the corrosive hangover of societal upheaval from lack of funds to put in motion thé known remedies and solutions. Almost all of them could be well funded.
Forward to a possible global effect
shaking the World into world cooperation and not confrontation
the vision of the UN may yet be restored
USA and Russia join the International Court of Justice, for starter. What they scared of? Justice?
Which Court just so happened to issue a world wide injunction against the war and ordered Russia out of Ukraine. No, not worthless
a recognized legal document of moral judgment.
If only America had the moral high ground to claim this legal victory
and, with the authorization of the UN and ICC, to engage in enforcement of the injunction.
Why cant international disputes be decided by world wide respected jurists, learned in the international law? Give it a go. What we got to lose? War?
Ron Green
(9,821 posts)(which seems to be the source of most of DUs discussion) is a seamless part and partner in the MICs greed.
mitch96
(13,822 posts)No labor costs save the expense of keeping them alive. They then work up from there.
No wages to low wages. No benefits to low benefits. Anything that sticks up, hammer it back down.. Maximize profits at any cost.. YMMV
m