General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJosh Hawley's latest attack on Ketanji Brown Jackson is genuinely nauseating
Link to tweet
https://www.vox.com/2022/3/18/22983877/supreme-court-josh-hawley-ketanji-brown-jackson-child-pornography-sentencing
On Wednesday evening, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) leveled a false and astonishing charge against Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson. Judge Jackson, Hawley untruthfully claimed, spent the last quarter decade advocating for and later using her position as a judge to protect child pornographers.
Hawleys broad allegation is false. His most substantive claim against Jackson is that as a judge she frequently did not follow the federal sentencing guidelines when sentencing child pornography offenders. But, as Ohio State law professor and sentencing policy expert Douglas Berman writes, the federal sentencing guidelines for child pornography offenders are widely recognized as dysfunctional and unduly severe.
Its also a stunningly inflammatory charge, reminiscent of conspiracy theories such as QAnon or Pizzagate, which posit that prominent liberals are part of a vast ring of pedophiles. Similarly incendiary claims have inspired violence in the past, such as when a man with an assault rifle opened fire in a DC pizza restaurant in 2016. The man was apparently motivated by his unfounded belief that Hillary Clinton and her former campaign chair John Podesta ran a child sexual abuse ring in the basement of this pizzeria.
Hawley sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will hold a confirmation hearing on Jacksons nomination next week. If his public statements this week are any indication, its likely that Hawley will spend his portion of this hearing berating Jackson with allegations that she is somehow an ally of sex offenders. It is most likely inevitable, in other words, that Hawleys attacks on Jackson will reach a wide audience.
*snip*
Aviation Pro
(12,181 posts)Senators Fist and Cancun.
dalton99a
(81,565 posts)JohnSJ
(92,325 posts)Volaris
(10,274 posts)Somebody should check, since projection is a thing for them lol.
Caliman73
(11,742 posts)We can loathe their actions and the damage they cause to others, but I would not use fulfilling a constitutional right as a weapon. Judge Jackson was a public defender. She most certainly defended people who were guilty and did some horrible things. That does not make her a bad person.
Hawley is disgusting, not for his jobs in the past, but for his views past and present.
Hawley supported the violent insurrection against duly elected officials fulfilling their roles. He has also, in a cowardly manner, failed to be honest about that support. He thinks that he is some kind of folk hero, but that is a delusion. I don't foresee him attaining any further power in the future. He isn't smart enough to avoid the rake indefinitely.
JohnSJ
(92,325 posts)She couldn't get out of it, but as an lawyer it was her job to defend her client to the best of her ability
What is obscene is people like Hawley know what their oath requires, and because they are hypocrites and ethically challenged, they don't care
2naSalit
(86,742 posts)Dig up all his skeletons in a very public and unpleasant manner.
CurtEastPoint
(18,656 posts)Response to Nevilledog (Original post)
Sherman A1 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Caliman73
(11,742 posts)I bet he will cry (not that crying is bad) when he gets hauled away. Like Bud Fox in Wall Street.
spanone
(135,857 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,869 posts)Zeitghost
(3,866 posts)But anyone who thinks sentencing guidelines for child pornographers are too severe (and i don't believe Judge Jackson is among them) is wrong. Anything short of death would be appropriate and even that tests my anti-death penalty stance.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Mr. Hitler Salute should be behind bars.