Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,170 posts)
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 03:24 PM Mar 2022

Josh Hawley's latest attack on Ketanji Brown Jackson is genuinely nauseating





https://www.vox.com/2022/3/18/22983877/supreme-court-josh-hawley-ketanji-brown-jackson-child-pornography-sentencing


On Wednesday evening, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) leveled a false and astonishing charge against Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson. Judge Jackson, Hawley untruthfully claimed, spent the last quarter decade advocating for — and later using her position as a judge to protect — child pornographers.

Hawley’s broad allegation is false. His most substantive claim against Jackson is that as a judge she frequently did not follow the federal sentencing guidelines when sentencing child pornography offenders. But, as Ohio State law professor and sentencing policy expert Douglas Berman writes, “the federal sentencing guidelines for” child pornography offenders “are widely recognized as dysfunctional and unduly severe.”

It’s also a stunningly inflammatory charge, reminiscent of conspiracy theories such as QAnon or Pizzagate, which posit that prominent liberals are part of a vast ring of pedophiles. Similarly incendiary claims have inspired violence in the past, such as when a man with an assault rifle opened fire in a DC pizza restaurant in 2016. The man was apparently motivated by his unfounded belief that Hillary Clinton and her former campaign chair John Podesta ran a child sexual abuse ring in the basement of this pizzeria.

Hawley sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will hold a confirmation hearing on Jackson’s nomination next week. If his public statements this week are any indication, it’s likely that Hawley will spend his portion of this hearing berating Jackson with allegations that she is somehow an ally of sex offenders. It is most likely inevitable, in other words, that Hawley’s attacks on Jackson will reach a wide audience.

*snip*


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Josh Hawley's latest attack on Ketanji Brown Jackson is genuinely nauseating (Original Post) Nevilledog Mar 2022 OP
Two of the planet's most punchable faces are in that pic. Aviation Pro Mar 2022 #1
+1 dalton99a Mar 2022 #12
Hawley is a POS, who supported the insurrectionists JohnSJ Mar 2022 #2
Hes also a lawyer, right? Has he ever defended a single sex offender? Volaris Mar 2022 #6
Sex offenders have a right to defense. Caliman73 Mar 2022 #7
You are right. Hillary was disparaged by some because she was assigned to defend a sex offender. JohnSJ Mar 2022 #14
Someone needs to... 2naSalit Mar 2022 #3
The real reason he's nasty.... CurtEastPoint Mar 2022 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Sherman A1 Mar 2022 #5
Very succinct!! 100% agree. Caliman73 Mar 2022 #8
It's horrific to find how many vile, hateful pieces of shit inhabit our halls of congress spanone Mar 2022 #9
He is just a nauseating person. With awful hair. leftyladyfrommo Mar 2022 #10
I won't defend that Magat Zeitghost Mar 2022 #11
Cue the Qtards. BlueIdaho Mar 2022 #13

Volaris

(10,274 posts)
6. Hes also a lawyer, right? Has he ever defended a single sex offender?
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 06:18 PM
Mar 2022

Somebody should check, since projection is a thing for them lol.

Caliman73

(11,742 posts)
7. Sex offenders have a right to defense.
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 06:31 PM
Mar 2022

We can loathe their actions and the damage they cause to others, but I would not use fulfilling a constitutional right as a weapon. Judge Jackson was a public defender. She most certainly defended people who were guilty and did some horrible things. That does not make her a bad person.

Hawley is disgusting, not for his jobs in the past, but for his views past and present.

Hawley supported the violent insurrection against duly elected officials fulfilling their roles. He has also, in a cowardly manner, failed to be honest about that support. He thinks that he is some kind of folk hero, but that is a delusion. I don't foresee him attaining any further power in the future. He isn't smart enough to avoid the rake indefinitely.

JohnSJ

(92,325 posts)
14. You are right. Hillary was disparaged by some because she was assigned to defend a sex offender.
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 08:29 PM
Mar 2022

She couldn't get out of it, but as an lawyer it was her job to defend her client to the best of her ability

What is obscene is people like Hawley know what their oath requires, and because they are hypocrites and ethically challenged, they don't care


Response to Nevilledog (Original post)

Caliman73

(11,742 posts)
8. Very succinct!! 100% agree.
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 06:33 PM
Mar 2022

I bet he will cry (not that crying is bad) when he gets hauled away. Like Bud Fox in Wall Street.

Zeitghost

(3,866 posts)
11. I won't defend that Magat
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 07:10 PM
Mar 2022

But anyone who thinks sentencing guidelines for child pornographers are too severe (and i don't believe Judge Jackson is among them) is wrong. Anything short of death would be appropriate and even that tests my anti-death penalty stance.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Josh Hawley's latest atta...