Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WarGamer

(12,354 posts)
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 09:47 PM Mar 2022

Winning battles... Russian style.

People have referred to Russian "combat strategy" and how they disregard losses.

Let me whip out a shiny example.

It is 1943 in Kharkov, Ukraine.

There have been THREE previous battles here since 1941. The Germans took it and then got kicked out and then took it again.

So it's 1943 and the Russians decided to take Kharkov back for good this time.

The Russians brought to the party, 1.1 million men and 2400 tanks and 13k pieces of artillery.

The Germans stood there in Kharkov with 200,000 men and 200 tanks.

They fought like hell for 3 weeks until the Russians sent the Germans packing... permanently this time.

Losses:

Germans lost 10k soldiers with 16k wounded and 240 tanks.

Russians lost 80k soldiers with 184k wounded and lost 1800 tanks and 423 artillery pieces and 153 aircraft.
Sound familiar?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Winning battles... Russian style. (Original Post) WarGamer Mar 2022 OP
So an invading country, Germany, cut their losses and ran. Got it. nt Phoenix61 Mar 2022 #1
the point is... WarGamer Mar 2022 #2
They were both invading countries Gore1FL Mar 2022 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #3
yikes... WarGamer Mar 2022 #4
Except this isn't like the 1943 situation, it's closer to a 1941 situation... JHB Mar 2022 #5
all true... but I'm just pointing out the Russian strategy of sacrificing soldiers. WarGamer Mar 2022 #6

WarGamer

(12,354 posts)
2. the point is...
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 09:52 PM
Mar 2022

The Russians are careless with their manpower. Consistently through WW2 they were careless and it looks like that has carried over.

The US... in Iraq for example... would hold up a convoy for 2 hours because of a single sniper in a building and call in an A-10 strike.

We treat every combat life as precious.

Response to WarGamer (Original post)

JHB

(37,155 posts)
5. Except this isn't like the 1943 situation, it's closer to a 1941 situation...
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 10:08 PM
Mar 2022

Leadership losses (for the Soviets, form Stalin's purges; now, through combat losses and Putin sacking generals) in a military with a very top-down command structure. Lower levels can't step up and carry on when a superior becomes a casualty because they don't know enough of the bigger picture.

Equipment problems: in 1941, from more advanced German tech and higher readiness. Now, from poor maintenance and budgetary neglect of support and supply forces.

And this time it's not Soviets defending their homeland against an invader. Today, Russia is the invader and it's the Ukranians doggedly defending.

Not to mention that the Soviets were receiving supplies and equipment from the US and Britain. Now it's the Ukraine getting that level of aid. If the Russians get assistance from China, India, or other palaces, it won't be anything close to the same scale.

WarGamer

(12,354 posts)
6. all true... but I'm just pointing out the Russian strategy of sacrificing soldiers.
Fri Mar 18, 2022, 10:15 PM
Mar 2022

Seems like nothing has changed. They'll give up 10 to kill 1.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Winning battles... Russia...