General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, what if, in the Jackson Senate hearing, Democrats repeat verbatim (with some
clarifications), the same questions Republicans asked the last Supreme Court nominee, Amy Barrett? Republicans can ask the same questions that the Democrats did (with clarifications) in their questions during the hearing.
Would make great theater.
brooklynite
(93,839 posts)Do you imagine that anyone remembers what questions were asked of Judge Barrett?
OAITW r.2.0
(23,810 posts)Nomination process is BS. Republicans will vote lockstep against her nomination because that furthers their political (and personal financial) interests.
brooklynite
(93,839 posts)How will this be "theatre"? And what will this theatre achieve?
nb: the job of the democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee is to get the nominee approved; not to "own the conservatives"
OAITW r.2.0
(23,810 posts)It is a party line vote. Hearings are meaningless. You probably think differently than I do about this...totally understand. You support this political theater,,,,,fundraising has never been better. AskBlue.
brooklynite
(93,839 posts)My goal is to get Judge Jackson approved as expeditiously as possible.
tritsofme
(17,320 posts)This is just silly.