Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 08:01 AM Mar 2022

Why Were Sunflowers Planted In The Shadow Of Nuclear Disasters?

Sunflowers are symbols of nuclear disarmament.
Not only are sunflowers symbols of optimism, they also possess a special capability: they absorb radioactive isotopes from the environment. In fact, sunflowers have been planted at both the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear disaster sites because they help to remove radioactive toxins from the environment. When the Soviet Union broke apart in 1991, the new nation of Ukraine held the third-largest arsenal of nuclear weapons. In 1996, Ukraine committed to total nuclear disarmament. To honor the occasion, representatives from the U.S., Ukraine, and Russia planted sunflowers in the locations where there had previously been nuclear missile silos.

https://www.scienceabc.com/nature/why-were-sunflowers-planted-in-the-shadow-of-nuclear-disasters.html?fbclid=IwAR2ZvVv640q_4LDgR-Z6_lH2Chu4jhvXuyEEFxOdJ_FJ6-6-KGaWlFgx65c

“In 1996, when Ukraine became a non-nuclear-weapon state, sunflowers were planted at a missile base in the country to celebrate this monumental occasion. Since then, sunflowers have become a symbol of a world free of nuclear weapons. But that is not all there is. It has been discovered that planting sunflowers after a nuclear accident may help clean up the contaminated areas, given the appropriate conditions.”




8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Were Sunflowers Planted In The Shadow Of Nuclear Disasters? (Original Post) G_j Mar 2022 OP
In retrospect, it seems a mistake for Ukraine to have given up is nuclear weapons. Lonestarblue Mar 2022 #1
This BGBD Mar 2022 #4
Those nuclear weapons were useless to them. Calista241 Mar 2022 #6
yes, G_j Mar 2022 #8
A Daisy had tremendous impact long ago randr Mar 2022 #2
Wish we could outlaw them worldwide KS Toronado Mar 2022 #3
K & R...nt Wounded Bear Mar 2022 #5
I don't know, but it's all fun and games until Downtown Hound Mar 2022 #7

Lonestarblue

(9,958 posts)
1. In retrospect, it seems a mistake for Ukraine to have given up is nuclear weapons.
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 08:58 AM
Mar 2022

I doubt Russia would be invading if they still had them. Russia is the country that should have been forced to give up its weapons. The world would be a lot safer. The promises made to Ukraine of protection from aggression or invasion by other countries have not been honored and were ineffective from the beginning. The promise was to take the matter to the UN where Russia has a veto over everything. Of course, hindsight makes issues so much clearer, but the reality then and now is that Russia has rarely been ruled by someone who wanted anything but utter control and expansion of anti-democratic ideology. Trusting such leaders has been a mistake.

The US was a signatory to this agreement, though, and I believe we owe Ukraine the protection promised. War is not desirable, but sometimes it is necessary to counter the actions of the truly evil. Hitler was placated for far too long. We should not make the same mistake with Putin. He cannot face a loss and any negotiations for him to take the eastern half of Ukraine along with all the southern ports are a nonstarter for Ukraine. Putin will just continue escalating with ever-more lethal weapons, including chemical weapons, until NATO has no choice but to step in militarily.

I read this morning in Tom Friedman’s column in the NYT that one of Putin’s possible goals now is to continue bombing civilians to drive more of them into NATO countries with the idea that NATO will splinter apart because of so many refugees. Interesting idea, though NATO seems pretty unified at the moment.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
6. Those nuclear weapons were useless to them.
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 10:17 AM
Mar 2022

All the command codes that would have let someone use the weapons as is were in possession of the new Russian government in Moscow, and the Ukrainian government didn't have access to them.

I suppose they could have made a dirty bomb, but they could have done that more cheaply with any of the nuclear waste currently in storage at their nuclear power plants.

They also could have disassembled the bombs, removed the nuclear material and created a new bomb design and ignition procedure, but that would've required a massive, massive investment in time, money, and engineering talent that at the time was better used elsewhere.

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
7. I don't know, but it's all fun and games until
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 10:40 AM
Mar 2022

one of the sunflowers mutates from the radiation and turns into a giant, city-destroying, beast that levels everything in its path in an effort to to teach us not to tamper in God's domain.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Were Sunflowers Plant...