Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 12:23 PM Mar 2022

Does NATO have a "red line"? Do we? Should we? If we do, should we announce it?

Short of the use of conventional nukes, i.e., not "tactical" nukes, or a serious attack on a "major" NATO country, I am not sure we would respond militarily.

Is it a good thing or a bad thing that I'm not sure?

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Ocelot II

(115,584 posts)
2. The red line, as I understand it, is any attack on any NATO member,
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 12:28 PM
Mar 2022

and they have been pretty clear about that. Under Article 5 it wouldn't have to be a major NATO member.

rso

(2,267 posts)
3. NATO
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 12:32 PM
Mar 2022

If we have a specific red line that we will absolutely not allow to be crossed, we should announce it. As of now, it’s limited to an attack on a NATO member, but it should be broadened in my view.

David__77

(23,321 posts)
4. President Biden stated his "red line."
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 12:33 PM
Mar 2022

Red line #1: US forces "are not engaged and will not engage in the conflict with Russian forces in Ukraine."

Red line #2: "The United States and our allies will defend every inch of … NATO territory with the full force of our collective power—every single inch."

brush

(53,740 posts)
5. Absolutely, If Russia attacks a NATO nation, we retaliate.
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 12:33 PM
Mar 2022

The problem now is that Ukraine is not a member nation.

That problem might soob be adjusted though as Putin is on the verge of going to far.

DetroitLegalBeagle

(1,914 posts)
6. The red line is an attack on a NATO member.
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 12:54 PM
Mar 2022

Outside of that, I don't expect us to do much more than what we already are.

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
7. Not disagreeing, just asking: so, a tactical nuke or two used in Ukraine or the use of chemical or
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 01:02 PM
Mar 2022

biological weapons would not mean we'd respond?

And, would an "errant" missile that "accidentally" landed on a residential area in a NATO nation be an "attack"?

DetroitLegalBeagle

(1,914 posts)
10. I enjoy going to Las Vegas casino's a few times a year
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 01:40 PM
Mar 2022

So I am no stranger on losing money on poor bets and odds.
And even I wouldn't put money on NATO directly attacking Russia for anything less than a direct attack against NATO. I think its fairly obvious that NATO wants to avoid anything that could lead to a nuclear confrontation with Russia.

Torchlight

(3,293 posts)
14. NATO's involvement in Bosnia was the result of
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 02:29 PM
Mar 2022

the Army of Republika Srpska, which had threatened and attacked UN-designated "safe areas" within the borders of a non-Nato member.

Happy Hoosier

(7,215 posts)
13. The US is not, of course, forbidden from action.
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 02:28 PM
Mar 2022

Article 5 describes obligations. It doesn’t specify limits on what individual member states can do.

Naturally, smaller states would be less likely to act independently.

MyMission

(1,849 posts)
9. Their borders are the red lines
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 01:15 PM
Mar 2022

Cross the border line in a NATO country, and action will be taken.
What action? That remains to be seen.

I say you strike us, step over the line, we strike you back harder

Chainfire

(17,467 posts)
11. Certainly there are red lines. That is called strategic planning.
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 01:42 PM
Mar 2022

It is only necessary that NATO and Putin know what the lines are. Nobody in a leadership wants crowd sourcing, by people who know don't know jack, that deal with issues that could involve the end of civilization. I am quite happy with that. If we trust your Commander in Chief to do the right thing, so should all of us.

I just thank Dog that we have a real Commander in Chief and not a damn Trump calling our part of the shots. I have complete faith that Biden will do the right thing for us.

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
12. You beat me to the punch with that last remark.
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 02:23 PM
Mar 2022

I do not know what the exact circumstances and capabilities are on either side and even if I did, i would not be prepared to decide the fate of the world. There have been a lot of atrocities committed by Putin so far and I am reasonably sure there are more to come and there are no "sure thing" options available.

As you said, we should all be thankful for Joe's experience, his decency and his "steady as she goes" response to a madman with his own red button.

Volaris

(10,266 posts)
17. Biden already defined it when he said we will defend every inch of NATO ground.
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 08:10 PM
Mar 2022

Putin does something stupid like flip a cruise missile into Poland and I suspect that within 6 weeks he will have his entire military destroyed and his govt crushed.

It will make Baghdad look like a flag football nerf game.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does NATO have a "red lin...