General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGiven Destruction By Sandy - Are The Repugs Or Dems More Likely To Not Vote?.....
Talk of how bad H. Sandy could be to many states and the possibility of widespread power outages, flood damage, damage to buildings and large amounts of snow - voters might face roadblocks to inhibit their getting out to vote.
If people's houses or property sustained storm damage - will they even be interested in voting or will they be so preoccupied that they will either blow off voting or forget to vote.
I was just wondering which voters might be more inclined to not vote - Repugs or Dems?
putitinD
(1,551 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Where there is early voting, Dems are turning out in high numbers. In the DC area, the turnout is much higher than they were prepared for because of the storm, so I think the Dems, especially in urban areas, will crawl over broken glass this election too. The DNCC has done a good job, I think, of pushing the urgency of GOTV this year.
yellerpup
(12,253 posts)We have too much at stake to sit this out. I don't believe the opposition is all that fired up about their candidate, especially if voting becomes inconvenient.
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)outcome. If the polls and infrastructure is messed up in Philadelphia that would hurt Obama more. Since it is without early voting Virginia could also be an issue. Obviously those living on the edge (more likely to be Democratic voters) are going to find it more difficult to vote with the loss of infrastructure.
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)The East Coast is all blue state territory. N.Y. area especially.
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)Philadelphia. Enough to lose PA? Probably not but you have to keep an eye on it.
yellerpup
(12,253 posts)for Rmoney's candidacy. The Republican base, especially the fundamentalists, will not go out of their way to support someone they don't like. He's not likeable and I don't recall any poll where he has achieved anywhere close to 50%. I think he's done. I don't think KKKarl is, but Mitt is done.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)1. There is no big storm; it is a conspiracy. It is not even going to rain this week.
2. Since there's no big storm approaching, if only to deny the reality of dense clouds, wind and rain, they will stubbornly dig in their heels and there will be no early voting or preparations.
3. Without early voting or preparations, they'll be too busy struggling to survive when the conspiracy storm actually strikes.
But what I'm really waiting for is the mayhem that ensues when the FEMA trucks start arriving to help them out. I just hope they're not greeted with a hail of bullets before the teabaggers are carted off to the FEMA internment camps!
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)global1
(25,261 posts)the Repugs will feel the consequences of being storm ravaged more than Dems. Many Repugs have it so good all the time that when the slightest hitch in their wagon hits - they fall to pieces and can't cope.
Seems to me Dems are more used to dealing with problems and might not be so distraught.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)Whether it is happening or not...it could happen.
That's their DNA
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)and to where.
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)It takes longer to get there, so some people won't have time. Others won't want to fight the waterlogged streets. Others will find it too dangerous to be out and about with a hurricane on the way.
I don't know whether it'll affect Repubs or Dems more, though.
Freddie
(9,269 posts)They tend to vote Repug.
Cities and suburbs here in PA tend to have fewer and shorter outages (advantage to us) plus city folks can often walk to their voting places.