Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 986 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank you Dick Durbin for destroying Hawley (Original Post)
malaise
Mar 2022
OP
She was so far ahead of Hee-Hawley that she lapped him and kicked him in the ass
Blue Owl
Mar 2022
#5
Blue Owl
(50,291 posts)1. Now scrape up what's left of him and hose down the floor
Response to Blue Owl (Reply #1)
malaise This message was self-deleted by its author.
malaise
(268,725 posts)3. Senator Hirono i finishing him off along with the other
hypocritical ReTHUGs
Blue Owl
(50,291 posts)5. She was so far ahead of Hee-Hawley that she lapped him and kicked him in the ass
Response to Blue Owl (Reply #5)
malaise This message was self-deleted by its author.
malaise
(268,725 posts)7. Nicely played
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)4. The problem with his line of questioning is that we don't know the facts
Not all cases are the same. Not all people being sentenced are the same. Mandatory minimums are difficult propositions because judges should have the discretion in sentencing.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)8. details please
can't watch....
working
malaise
(268,725 posts)9. Here - was waiting for a link
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/22/durbin-defends-jackson-says-congress-has-failed-to-do-its-job-on-sentencing-guidelines-00019457
Durbin then referred to a case he mentioned earlier Tuesday involving federal Judge Sarah Pitlick of Missouri, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump and whom Hawley backed. The Senate Judiciary chair noted that the judges sentence in the case was well below what was recommended by the guidelines.
The latest updates from Jacksons Supreme Court confirmation hearings
Hawley attempted to chime in, but Durbin asked to finish his statement. He then turned to the focus of Hawleys line of questioning, the United States v. Hawkins case, in which Jackson sentenced the defendant to three months, a ruling below the prosecutors recommendation of two years.
She faced a situation where she decided she would not follow the guidelines and took a sentence of less than half of what they recommended, Durbin said of Pitlick. We have created a situation because of our inattention and unwillingness to tackle an extremely controversial area in Congress and left it to the judges. And I think we have to accept some responsibility for that, senator.
The Missouri Republican defended Pitlick for following the prosecutors recommendation in that case, adding that his concern with Jackson was that she didnt follow the prosecutors recommendation or the sentencing guidelines in the Hawkins case.
Durbin then referred to a case he mentioned earlier Tuesday involving federal Judge Sarah Pitlick of Missouri, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump and whom Hawley backed. The Senate Judiciary chair noted that the judges sentence in the case was well below what was recommended by the guidelines.
The latest updates from Jacksons Supreme Court confirmation hearings
Hawley attempted to chime in, but Durbin asked to finish his statement. He then turned to the focus of Hawleys line of questioning, the United States v. Hawkins case, in which Jackson sentenced the defendant to three months, a ruling below the prosecutors recommendation of two years.
She faced a situation where she decided she would not follow the guidelines and took a sentence of less than half of what they recommended, Durbin said of Pitlick. We have created a situation because of our inattention and unwillingness to tackle an extremely controversial area in Congress and left it to the judges. And I think we have to accept some responsibility for that, senator.
The Missouri Republican defended Pitlick for following the prosecutors recommendation in that case, adding that his concern with Jackson was that she didnt follow the prosecutors recommendation or the sentencing guidelines in the Hawkins case.
malaise
(268,725 posts)10. Here - was waiting for a link
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/22/durbin-defends-jackson-says-congress-has-failed-to-do-its-job-on-sentencing-guidelines-00019457
Durbin then referred to a case he mentioned earlier Tuesday involving federal Judge Sarah Pitlick of Missouri, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump and whom Hawley backed. The Senate Judiciary chair noted that the judges sentence in the case was well below what was recommended by the guidelines.
The latest updates from Jacksons Supreme Court confirmation hearings
Hawley attempted to chime in, but Durbin asked to finish his statement. He then turned to the focus of Hawleys line of questioning, the United States v. Hawkins case, in which Jackson sentenced the defendant to three months, a ruling below the prosecutors recommendation of two years.
She faced a situation where she decided she would not follow the guidelines and took a sentence of less than half of what they recommended, Durbin said of Pitlick. We have created a situation because of our inattention and unwillingness to tackle an extremely controversial area in Congress and left it to the judges. And I think we have to accept some responsibility for that, senator.
The Missouri Republican defended Pitlick for following the prosecutors recommendation in that case, adding that his concern with Jackson was that she didnt follow the prosecutors recommendation or the sentencing guidelines in the Hawkins case.
Durbin then referred to a case he mentioned earlier Tuesday involving federal Judge Sarah Pitlick of Missouri, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump and whom Hawley backed. The Senate Judiciary chair noted that the judges sentence in the case was well below what was recommended by the guidelines.
The latest updates from Jacksons Supreme Court confirmation hearings
Hawley attempted to chime in, but Durbin asked to finish his statement. He then turned to the focus of Hawleys line of questioning, the United States v. Hawkins case, in which Jackson sentenced the defendant to three months, a ruling below the prosecutors recommendation of two years.
She faced a situation where she decided she would not follow the guidelines and took a sentence of less than half of what they recommended, Durbin said of Pitlick. We have created a situation because of our inattention and unwillingness to tackle an extremely controversial area in Congress and left it to the judges. And I think we have to accept some responsibility for that, senator.
The Missouri Republican defended Pitlick for following the prosecutors recommendation in that case, adding that his concern with Jackson was that she didnt follow the prosecutors recommendation or the sentencing guidelines in the Hawkins case.