Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Media people saying "booms" instead of "explosions." (Original Post) betsuni Mar 2022 OP
Desensitizing to horror and the child-like vocabulary that entices some viewers, I guess. hlthe2b Mar 2022 #1
It trivializes deadly war actions, meant to murder. You are not alone, betsuni. Judi Lynn Mar 2022 #2
Thank you! betsuni Mar 2022 #5
But are all booms explosions? 2naSalit Mar 2022 #3
"Boom" is a child's description of a loud noise. betsuni Mar 2022 #4
EXACTLY!!!!! Ford_Prefect Mar 2022 #6
Agreed. 2naSalit Mar 2022 #7
So? Effete Snob Mar 2022 #8
"Boom" describes a sound. "Explosion" isn't a sound. SoonerPride Mar 2022 #9
When describing an explosion "boom" isn't correct. betsuni Mar 2022 #10
If it is unseen then they don't know what caused the sound. SoonerPride Mar 2022 #12
Reminds me of this old Conan O'Brien bit from 2003 featuring "Geraldo Rivera" Tommy Carcetti Mar 2022 #11

2naSalit

(86,330 posts)
3. But are all booms explosions?
Wed Mar 23, 2022, 07:28 AM
Mar 2022

I can imagine, since I live in a rail town, that there are other things that make such sounds that are not explosions. I'm not saying that seeing the flash from a bomb blast in the background while a reporter is standing in the foreground talking about bombings and calling them booms, that is just weird unless they simply lack vocabulary for whatever reasons.

2naSalit

(86,330 posts)
7. Agreed.
Wed Mar 23, 2022, 07:43 AM
Mar 2022

I can imagine that some of these reporters have not been in a war zone or near one before and are a little rattled which might explain reverting to use of that word. In times of duress, adults will revert to less sophisticated terminology.

Not absolving them just trying to reason out why reporters would say that rather than something more accurately descriptive.



I need to drink more coffee!

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
8. So?
Wed Mar 23, 2022, 08:28 AM
Mar 2022

If a supersonic jet goes by, it is a loud noise which is not an explosion.

If a building collapses, it is a loud noise and not an explosion.

Not of those things, and many others, will go “boom”.

“Explosion” does not describe a sound. An “explosion” is one of possible causes of a loud sound.

However, to say that every loud sound is an “explosion” without knowing what caused the sound, is to draw an inappropriate inference, instead of reporting a fact.

betsuni

(25,380 posts)
10. When describing an explosion "boom" isn't correct.
Wed Mar 23, 2022, 09:35 AM
Mar 2022

These news programs are describing explosions. War.

SoonerPride

(12,286 posts)
12. If it is unseen then they don't know what caused the sound.
Wed Mar 23, 2022, 10:04 AM
Mar 2022

Describing the sound is correct reportage.

Sonic booms are "booms"

Train crashes are "booms"

Plane crashes go "boom."

Bombs go "boom."

If they don't have video evidence or see the cause of the sound then reporting a "boom" was an explosion is erroneous reporting.

Report what actually was observed, which in many cases is just the sound itself.

Which is a boom.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Media people saying "boom...