Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,065 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 05:07 PM Mar 2022

9 Senators to Watch

https://politicalwire.com/2022/03/24/9-senators-to-watch/

9 Senators to Watch
March 24, 2022 at 3:45 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard


There are nine key senators to watch on Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nomination to the Supreme Court, Politico reports: Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, Mitt Romney, Lindsey Graham, Roy Blunt, Rob Portman, Richard Burr, Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinama.

Playbook: “Why this group? While Manchin and Sinema can pretty safely be counted as ‘yes’ votes for Dems, some of the Republicans are ‘torn between supporting Jackson’s historic nomination and voting no based on opposition to her judicial philosophy. A few in that group are retiring this year, freeing them from the potential political risks of backing her nomination, although a vote to confirm Jackson would roil the GOP primaries currently underway to replace them.’
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
9 Senators to Watch (Original Post) babylonsister Mar 2022 OP
This line sticks out: TxGuitar Mar 2022 #1
They haven't really broken with the ranks on anything since announcing their retirement. Bev54 Mar 2022 #3
It may free them from that risk, FoxNewsSucks Mar 2022 #4
It was always going to be 50-50 bucolic_frolic Mar 2022 #2
Murkowski May vote yes SCantiGOP Mar 2022 #5
Zero Chance Graham & Blunt Vote Yes SoCalDavidS Mar 2022 #6
Portman will also be a no. He does whatever Moscow Mitch tells him to. blueinredohio Mar 2022 #7
"Voting no based on opposition to her judicial philosophy." Poiuyt Mar 2022 #8
+100 Well said. nt abqtommy Mar 2022 #9
They should be putting the screws to Susan fucking Collins jcgoldie Mar 2022 #10

TxGuitar

(4,190 posts)
1. This line sticks out:
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 05:10 PM
Mar 2022
A few in that group are retiring this year, freeing them from the potential political risks of backing her nomination


Cowards. Absolute fucking cowards.

Bev54

(10,052 posts)
3. They haven't really broken with the ranks on anything since announcing their retirement.
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 05:45 PM
Mar 2022

I am hoping Romney will vote for her, he has praised her credentials.

FoxNewsSucks

(10,429 posts)
4. It may free them from that risk,
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 05:48 PM
Mar 2022

but it just puts their private-sector "golden parachutes" at risk.

Republicons can never EVER be counted on to do what's right if there is any cost to them for doing it. Never.

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)
5. Murkowski May vote yes
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 05:57 PM
Mar 2022

Not a damn chance on Lindsey.
I commented on an news article in the Columbia, SC newspaper about Lindsey’s behavior at the hearing, saying he was an embarrassment to the State. As of last night it had 14 upvotes and only 6 down.

SoCalDavidS

(9,998 posts)
6. Zero Chance Graham & Blunt Vote Yes
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 05:59 PM
Mar 2022

Burr is probably also a No.

The Over/Under on repubs voting Yes is probably 3.

blueinredohio

(6,797 posts)
7. Portman will also be a no. He does whatever Moscow Mitch tells him to.
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 06:21 PM
Mar 2022

He doesn't have the balls he was born with.

Poiuyt

(18,123 posts)
8. "Voting no based on opposition to her judicial philosophy."
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 06:30 PM
Mar 2022

No, Republicans will all vote no because they will always vote to block anything Biden proposes.

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
10. They should be putting the screws to Susan fucking Collins
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 07:54 PM
Mar 2022

...every fucking day over her BS handling of Kavanaugh who wasn't going to overturn Roe.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»9 Senators to Watch