Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGraham, Hawley, and Cruz's mission was to establish cover for the republicans when they
vote "no" for confirmation of Judge Ketanji Brown by acting like the complete fools that they are and providing excuses. Skin head Rick Scott said he can't vote for her because she does not understand the three branches of government. WTF? Marsha was making a dig about the gay community by asking for a definition for woman. May karma forever hang over their GOP heads like the Sword of Damocles.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1071 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Graham, Hawley, and Cruz's mission was to establish cover for the republicans when they (Original Post)
diehardblue
Mar 2022
OP
NoMoreRepugs
(9,374 posts)1. Seriously? Scott said that?
Budi
(15,325 posts)2. Meanwhile at the Amy Coney Barrett nom...
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,462 posts)5. they dont want the supreme court to know law
republicans just want to control how they vote.
maybe this should be brought up in the hearings along with this video.Rethug heads will explode. And the public might be informed of the truth.
There are no requirements to be met in the constitution for appointing supreme court justices you know.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)3. Yes, they were always a NO, but had to square it with their god. Nt
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)4. +1,