Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mme. Defarge

(8,028 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:20 PM Mar 2022

At the very least, the Ginni Thomas revelations

fail the “appearance of a conflict of interest” test. Meaning that the expectation of confidence in the opinions and judgments of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has to be in serious doubt.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Samrob

(4,298 posts)
3. The integrity of the Court depends on his doing so. And that is the line Dems should push
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:25 PM
Mar 2022

every time they get a chance in every public and private opportunity, TV, radio, and print media included.

Mz Pip

(27,441 posts)
13. Republicans don't care
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:45 PM
Mar 2022

They don’t care about the integrity of the Court. That’s for historians to decide. They care about now and what the count can do for them now. Screw integrity.

dem4decades

(11,288 posts)
5. If he died tomorrow the Republicans would still put his robed body in his seat. He doesn't ask
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:29 PM
Mar 2022

questions anyway, who'd know?

Mz Pip

(27,441 posts)
12. Fat chance
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:43 PM
Mar 2022

He doesn’t care. He knows there aren’t enough votes to impeach him. He’ll waddle in giving a mental middle finger to all of his detractors. He’s smug, arrogant and doesn’t give a shit about ethics or the appearance of impropriety.

It could come out that Ginni was writing his opinions. Won’t matter and it won’t matter to conservatives either.

elleng

(130,895 posts)
2. IF one assumes spouses 'business' dealings are shared;
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:24 PM
Mar 2022

MINE were not, we practiced in completely different areas of law.

(This may be an extreme example, but may provide food for thought.)

Mme. Defarge

(8,028 posts)
4. That's why I emphasized
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:29 PM
Mar 2022

THE APPEARANCE of a conflict of interest, which is an important concept and distinction.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
6. I suppose it was inevitable that Thomas went down in flames like this
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:31 PM
Mar 2022

He was never up to the task to begin with, his ethics were unethical, his legal curiosity was limited, his judicial voice was the echo of a federalist memo, and he was married to a traitor.

Wouldn't it be sweet if we could "steal" a seat on the SC to at least partially compensate for the sneering hypocrisy of the right during Trump's tenure?

ymetca

(1,182 posts)
9. If he kicks
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:39 PM
Mar 2022

queue McConnell bloviating how it's "just too close" to the midterms for the President to be appointing any more SC judges!

enough

(13,259 posts)
10. What makes you think he's going down in flames?
Thu Mar 24, 2022, 09:39 PM
Mar 2022

If he recovers from his illness, it’s going to be business as usual for him and SCOTUS

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At the very least, the Gi...