Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 474 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manchin will vote yes on Jackson. Just announced on CNN (nt) (Original Post)
question everything
Mar 2022
OP
llashram
(6,265 posts)1. we'll see
UTUSN
(70,686 posts)2. Well glory be!1 - and a gratuitous la-dee-dah for good measure!1
walkingman
(7,610 posts)3. His country club friends will probably give him the evil-eye.
getagrip_already
(14,742 posts)4. I want to see how he said it.....
If he said "once it comes out of committee" it is a non-statement.
The qop will bottle it up there. The dems will have to pass a resolution to move to debate without a committee vote.
That is something Manchin has refused to do for reasons.
RedSpartan
(1,693 posts)5. Manchin has many faults
But he is a reliable vote for Democrat-nominated judges.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)6. He's not the one I ever worried about.
For all his faults and overall issues he's usually a relatively reliable judicial vote. I figured he'd vote for her.
Simena,on the other hand...