General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaybe after Ginni Thomas gets convicted, conservative blonde, white women all over this country
are going to realize that their fair colorings do not lend them extra privilege in this country afterall. Maybe they'll learn to be empathetic and decent? Hope springs eternal.
Response to Baitball Blogger (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
maxsolomon
(33,265 posts)What role did she play that is criminal? Has anyone else been indicted for it yet?
Bev54
(10,044 posts)just like Trump, Meadows, Bannon and all the other traitors. What is not criminal in those actions?
maxsolomon
(33,265 posts)Seditious Conspiracy? Is that the charge you expect? Only the Oath Keeper assholes have been charged with that, and I don't expect much more from Garland's DOJ.
I don't understand what she did that is specifically criminal, and no one calling for her head today on DU can explain it to me.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)that could be called criminal in the emails to Meadows specifically. (And I confess I havent read all of them - Ive naively just depended on the media to read us the worst of them). Its unimaginably stupid and more than a little scary that someone that whacked out is so close to power, but her rantings about overturning the election are really just unhinged rantings.
Bev54
(10,044 posts)and Proud Boys as stepping stones to the main conspirators and yes seditious conspiracy should be the charge.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Electoral votes for trump was criminal? Then VP, Biden, had to shut them down. For the record, I dont think their actions were criminal.
Democratic Reps Raskin, McGovern, Jayapal, Lee, Waters, and others, challenged the count claiming trump did not win states like Wisconsin. Biden shut them down.
Now, if they have evidence G Thomas was involved in storming the Capitol, or even in the planning to do so, then she needs to be indicted. Unfortunately, have not seen any evidence of that other than all those claiming she was involved with nothing to back it up.
Dont think we can save democracy, by taking undemocratic actions. Sorry.
Bev54
(10,044 posts)she was involved in the planning and inciting.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)You seem to have proof.
Bev54
(10,044 posts)I am not here to argue legalese with you at all. I am saying from where I am sitting she is just as guilty as Meadows, Trump and Bannon and Powell. They are all in this together and I think with time and documents we may well find that her husband may well have been part as well.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)people criminally in our country. Thats a good thing, dont you think?
Now if we find evidence she went beyond asking Meadows to do what he can, its a different story.
PlanetBev
(4,104 posts)Shes got power and money and a corrupt political party behind her.
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,667 posts)but won't be convicted of anything, white privilege for sure
BlueTsunami2018
(3,490 posts)What makes you think shell be convicted of anything? None of them will be.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)to just shut up and keep their thoughts private.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,312 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Not clear how many decency points not being conservative salvages -- some I hope? Anything else? To my mind this is hitting at least 3 for 3 with a swinging shovel so far. Oh, yeah! I'm "privileged." 4 for 4 and I should forget the points. And for you for the comparison with Ginni Thomas, a message I can't post here.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)With an exclamation point.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Nor will tfg.
pandr32
(11,572 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Or any men, for that matter.