Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,697 posts)
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 04:50 PM Mar 2022

Maybe after Ginni Thomas gets convicted, conservative blonde, white women all over this country

are going to realize that their fair colorings do not lend them extra privilege in this country afterall. Maybe they'll learn to be empathetic and decent? Hope springs eternal.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maybe after Ginni Thomas gets convicted, conservative blonde, white women all over this country (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Mar 2022 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2022 #1
Convicted for what, specifically? maxsolomon Mar 2022 #2
She was assisting in the planning of overturning a legitimately elected government Bev54 Mar 2022 #5
None of those people are being prosecuted for their actions. maxsolomon Mar 2022 #7
Based on what I've seen so far there isn't anything ... Whiskeytide Mar 2022 #8
I do expect Garland's DOJ is investigating and is using some of the Oath Keepers Bev54 Mar 2022 #9
Do you think the Jan 6 2017 attempt by 5 or so Democrats to challenge Hoyt Mar 2022 #11
No and there was not a legitimate coup in the works either. There was here and Bev54 Mar 2022 #13
Then show some proof she was involved in planning/executing breach of Capitol. Hoyt Mar 2022 #15
It wasn't necessarily the breach of the capital but the overturning of the election Bev54 Mar 2022 #18
Agree, She is unethical, immoral, and worse. That is not enough to charge Hoyt Mar 2022 #19
She ain't never gonna be convicted PlanetBev Mar 2022 #3
She is guilty as sin RANDYWILDMAN Mar 2022 #4
We still seem to be operating under the assumption that anyone will be held accountable. BlueTsunami2018 Mar 2022 #6
It's enough for me if they learn lunatica Mar 2022 #10
lol WhiskeyGrinder Mar 2022 #12
Seems racist a bit. And sexist and blondish to this white blonde woman. Hortensis Mar 2022 #14
I'll ditto your message. BlackSkimmer Mar 2022 #21
She's not going to be convicted of anything. BlackSkimmer Mar 2022 #16
Most of them aren't actually blond. pandr32 Mar 2022 #17
Well, it hasn't seemed to work as a deterrent for old, white, conservative men. BlackSkimmer Mar 2022 #20

Response to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

maxsolomon

(33,265 posts)
2. Convicted for what, specifically?
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 05:00 PM
Mar 2022

What role did she play that is criminal? Has anyone else been indicted for it yet?

Bev54

(10,044 posts)
5. She was assisting in the planning of overturning a legitimately elected government
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 05:15 PM
Mar 2022

just like Trump, Meadows, Bannon and all the other traitors. What is not criminal in those actions?

maxsolomon

(33,265 posts)
7. None of those people are being prosecuted for their actions.
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 05:23 PM
Mar 2022

Seditious Conspiracy? Is that the charge you expect? Only the Oath Keeper assholes have been charged with that, and I don't expect much more from Garland's DOJ.

I don't understand what she did that is specifically criminal, and no one calling for her head today on DU can explain it to me.

Whiskeytide

(4,461 posts)
8. Based on what I've seen so far there isn't anything ...
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 05:42 PM
Mar 2022

… that could be called criminal in the emails to Meadows specifically. (And I confess I haven’t read all of them - I’ve naively just depended on the media to read us the worst of them). It’s unimaginably stupid and more than a little scary that someone that whacked out is so close to power, but her rantings about overturning the election are really just unhinged rantings.

Bev54

(10,044 posts)
9. I do expect Garland's DOJ is investigating and is using some of the Oath Keepers
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 05:57 PM
Mar 2022

and Proud Boys as stepping stones to the main conspirators and yes seditious conspiracy should be the charge.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
11. Do you think the Jan 6 2017 attempt by 5 or so Democrats to challenge
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 06:10 PM
Mar 2022

Electoral votes for trump was criminal? Then VP, Biden, had to shut them down. For the record, I don’t think their actions were criminal.

Democratic Reps Raskin, McGovern, Jayapal, Lee, Waters, and others, challenged the count claiming trump did not win states like Wisconsin. Biden shut them down.

Now, if they have evidence G Thomas was involved in storming the Capitol, or even in the planning to do so, then she needs to be indicted. Unfortunately, have not seen any evidence of that other than all those claiming she was involved with nothing to back it up.

Don’t think we can save democracy, by taking undemocratic actions. Sorry.

Bev54

(10,044 posts)
13. No and there was not a legitimate coup in the works either. There was here and
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 06:12 PM
Mar 2022

she was involved in the planning and inciting.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
15. Then show some proof she was involved in planning/executing breach of Capitol.
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 06:14 PM
Mar 2022

You seem to have proof.

Bev54

(10,044 posts)
18. It wasn't necessarily the breach of the capital but the overturning of the election
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 06:28 PM
Mar 2022

I am not here to argue legalese with you at all. I am saying from where I am sitting she is just as guilty as Meadows, Trump and Bannon and Powell. They are all in this together and I think with time and documents we may well find that her husband may well have been part as well.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
19. Agree, She is unethical, immoral, and worse. That is not enough to charge
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 06:33 PM
Mar 2022

people criminally in our country. That’s a good thing, don’t you think?

Now if we find evidence she went beyond asking Meadows to “do what he can,” it’s a different story.

BlueTsunami2018

(3,490 posts)
6. We still seem to be operating under the assumption that anyone will be held accountable.
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 05:19 PM
Mar 2022

What makes you think she’ll be convicted of anything? None of them will be.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
14. Seems racist a bit. And sexist and blondish to this white blonde woman.
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 06:14 PM
Mar 2022

Not clear how many decency points not being conservative salvages -- some I hope? Anything else? To my mind this is hitting at least 3 for 3 with a swinging shovel so far. Oh, yeah! I'm "privileged." 4 for 4 and I should forget the points. And for you for the comparison with Ginni Thomas, a message I can't post here.

 

BlackSkimmer

(51,308 posts)
20. Well, it hasn't seemed to work as a deterrent for old, white, conservative men.
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 07:13 PM
Mar 2022

Or any men, for that matter.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe after Ginni Thomas ...