The wife of Thomas had access to the Whitehouse because of his job.

[fightforfreedom]

Who do these two assholes think they are kidding? They sit at home and talk about everything. They talk about politics, court cases, conspiracy theories, overthrowing the election.

She is part of his job. She has influence over him. They where in on this together. Thomas must resign.

[Lovie777]

1. Agreed . ...

[dixiechiken1]

2. He won't...

Nor will he recuse himself from any cases where he absolutely, at a minimum, should.

[3catwoman3]

3. There is no way Meadows would have taken a call...

...from Ginni Nobody.

[Hoyt]

4. Not for precedent where one is responsible for their spouses beliefs/actions. Could make an

except for Clarence Thomas, though.

[Mr.Bill]

7. If he had any idea of what she was doing

and didn't do anything about it, he is not only responsible, he is complicit.

[Hoyt]

8. Sorry, I disagree. So far there is no evidence she did anything illegal. Unhinged, cultish, immoral,

unethical, deplorable, etc., is not a crime.

I don't like GOPers either. But this is a democracy and people have a right to believe what they want. If they find evidence that she did more than ask Meadows to do what he can to overturn election, it's a new ball game. But I have yet to see any evidence she supported and help plan the storming of the Capitol.

[Mr.Bill]

10. I think coercing a government official to overturn an election

might be illegal. I'm not a lawyer, but,

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/610

[Hoyt]

11. Well, then, there are at least 5 Democratic Reps who challenged Jan 6, 2017

Electoral vote count. Then VP, Biden, shutdown Reps Raskin, Lee, McGovern, etc., quickly. Should they be indicted for trying to overturn official results? I think not.

Again, if she was involved in Capitol breach, lock her up.

[Mr.Bill]

12. A legal challenge is one thing,

coercing a government official to do something illegal is entirely different.

If what she was doing was legal, why was Thomas the only judge to vote to hide the evidence? This also implies he knew about it, and they talked about it.

Like I said, I'm not a lawyer, so there's really no point in me arguing it any further, but it sure doesn't smell right.

[Hoyt]

15. Show where she asked Meadows to do anything illegal. No prosecutor

would indict based upon her asking Meadows “to do what he can.”

I suspect Meadows got of calls or reading emails and said, “What the f%$k does that crazy fool think I can do.”

[Mr.Bill]

18. We haven't seen all the evidence yet

and the context of the texts. We don't even know if there are more texts that are incriminating. It's worth investigating and we'll see what the 1/6 committee does with it.

[Hoyt]

20. OK. Please post it when it's found. Have no problem investigating.

[gibraltar72]

14. Conspiracy to commit a crime is a crime of it's own.

[Hoyt]

16. Challenging the vote count is not a crime. Sorry. If you have

evidence she was involved in shutting down count, please post it. I don’t like the woman or her GOPer husband, but Democrats are not supposed to act like this without evidence.

[gibraltar72]

17. She went way beyond that.

she recruited people to go riot.

[Hoyt]

19. If you have evidence of that, I'll change my opinion quickly. Please post it.

The March on Washington, scheduled in mid-December, was a legal protest,although wasted effort by a bunch of rubes. Storming the Capitol wasn’t legal, hence prosecution of those who did it and their leaders who planned it out.

[BlackSkimmer]

5. He won't resign.

Not for this.

[Samrob]

6. Methinks this is only the tip of a very big iceberg. nt

[Mr.Bill]

13. He won't resign as long as he has a pulse. n/t

[ymetca]

9. Right and

JESUS, via the vehicle of Ginni's pie-hole, got Meadows "all ate up with the spirit of the LORD", and proceeded with the desperate attempt to placate a flatulent con-man in an orange combover. Behold the Power!

It's like we're living in one of the worst episode rejections from House of Cards.