Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 03:59 PM Oct 2012

In light of Sandy, storm surges, rising sea levels, etc.

I'd like to call your attention to the plight of the village of Newtok, Alaska, just one of several Western Alaska villages facing destruction from melting arctic ice, rising sea levels and erosion. I've posted in the "environment" forum links to a very informative series of reports/videos presented by local reporter Rhonda McBride detailing the challenges faced by this small Native village, population 370. The village must move ... but at a cost estimated at $130 million.

As sea levels rise, more and more cities and towns on the coasts in the Lower 48 will no doubt be facing these same sorts of issues but on an infinitely grander scale. Just think about it -- $130 million to move 370 people. How much will it cost to move Miami or New York City? And where?

Just something to think about. It's disturbing that the campaigns won't talk about these very foreseeable scenarios.

Here's the link on Newtok. http://www.democraticunderground.com/112726640

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In light of Sandy, storm surges, rising sea levels, etc. (Original Post) Blue_In_AK Oct 2012 OP
Why 130 million for 370 people? Marrah_G Oct 2012 #1
Western Alaska is extremely remote. Blue_In_AK Oct 2012 #3
Ahh okay Marrah_G Oct 2012 #5
K&R It's a good series of short videos. Speck Tater Oct 2012 #2
k&r... spanone Oct 2012 #4

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
3. Western Alaska is extremely remote.
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 04:14 PM
Oct 2012

There is no overland transportation from Anchorage or Fairbanks, the population centers in alaska, so all building materials would need to be flown or barged in. They're not only building homes but infrastructure, as well, which entails plumbing , power, etc. etc. Knowing how much things cost even here in "civilized" Alaska, it's easy for me to envision how a move like this could be quite pricy.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
5. Ahh okay
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 04:19 PM
Oct 2012

I was wondering why some homes couldn't be prefabbed and a new village built for alot less but your post explained it. Perhaps these folks are going to need to look at adding on to an existing community or something like that. I am betting there will be lots of displaces people in the coming decades due to water levels rising. Not everyone will be able to built new towns.

 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
2. K&R It's a good series of short videos.
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 04:02 PM
Oct 2012

Coincidentally, I just read about Newtok in the book I'm reading; "Eaarth" by Bill McKibben.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In light of Sandy, storm ...