General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExclusive: U.S. assesses up to 60% failure rate for some Russian missiles, officials say
A Sixty Percent (60%) failure rate is amazing. Russia is not a superpower and lack the technical skill to maintain and use high tech weapons. If Russia maintains its nuclear arsenal with the same competence as Russia maintains its cruise missiles, then we may have less to fear from Putin.
Link to tweet
The disclosure could help explain why Russia has failed to achieve what most could consider basic objectives since its invasion a month ago, such as neutralizing Ukraine's air force, despite the apparent strength of its military against Ukraine's much smaller armed forces.
The U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the information, did not provide evidence to support the assessment and did not disclose what precisely was driving high Russian missile failure rates......
Citing U.S. intelligence, three U.S. officials said the United States estimated that Russia's failure rate varied day-to-day, depended on the type of missile being launched, and could sometimes exceed 50%. Two of them said it reached as high as 60%.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)to today. Communism or a federation they are just covers for totalitarian and authoritarian systems milking Russia's resources to line the leaderships' pockets.
Putin truly f**ked himself. It wouldn't surprise me if this all fell apart and he ends up losing Crimea as well. Sergei may fall out a window if he gets blamed.
brewens
(13,349 posts)political spectrum behaved so similarly.
brewens
(13,349 posts)be expending many more than they planned for. That may be getting their inventory way down. They can't just produce more right away by magic. We might even have some key materials needed to make them cut off.
brer cat
(24,337 posts)and still have a well-performing military. Suck to be Putin.