The J6 Committee is scheduled to meet tomorrow.

[kentuck]

I heard some reporter on one of morning news show announce that they were prepared to make more criminal referrals and hand out more subpoenas.

He did not mention any names.

Previously, I had heard that Peter Navarro was one of the people to be subpoenaed.

It will be interesting to see who the lucky person (or people) are that get the criminal referrals.

[Achilleaze]

1. Bring down the Hammer of Justice on Republican traitors

[Mr. Ected]

2. I think you're right about Navarro

Refusing to testify to something he spoke openly about on television just a few weeks ago. What would he expect?

[dem4decades]

3. Maybe they should meet at DOJ to see if they can get Garland's attention?

[kentuck]

4. Would it make sense for the DOJ to indict or charge anyone before the Committee finishes....?

...their public hearings?

What impact could public hearings have on any DOJ investigations?

[dem4decades]

9. They certainly should be interviewing witnesses and preparing criminal cases.

It's well past time to get people on the record before their memories fade and their stories get rehearsed. But I fear DOJ is doing none of that, afraid to offend one of the two major political parties in the country, look away, nothing to see here.

[FakeNoose]

5. Since Mark Meadows turned over his documents last year

The J6 committee has had a long time to read those emails between Meadows and Ginni Thomas. I keep wondering how come we're hearing about this NOW, when they had the info since last summer?

Are they going to tell us why they took so long to release this info?

I have questions.

[SoCalDavidS]

6. I've Really Lost Hope That ANYTHING Will Come Of This

Mostly for the history books, which is fine, but completely unsatisfying, and utterly disappointing.

[kentuck]

7. Republicans aren't disappointed or dissatisfied..

They must feel like the bank robbers that got away with all the loot...

[Tickle]

10. Has anything been done

to those who refuse their subpoena’s?