Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSC questions here
Was the SC rules ALWAYS as they are today? (pertaining to recusing themselves) How were these rules established?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 723 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SC questions here (Original Post)
bluestarone
Mar 2022
OP
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)1. See...
bluestarone
(16,722 posts)2. TY for this
After reading this, it seems like lots of words that really do not mean anything. SC Judges have free rein to do anything they want.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)4. Basically they are on "the honor system". n/t
bluestarone
(16,722 posts)6. Yea looks like that. AND
WE know how that works with people like TFG'S followers!!! (and some of religious right group)
Demsrule86
(68,352 posts)3. There are really no rules...they can pretty much do as they choose.
bluestarone
(16,722 posts)5. Yea looks like it.
I'm wondering if it was that way always?