Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mnmoderatedem

(3,717 posts)
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 10:41 PM Mar 2022

Well lookee here. Seems Senate repubs were - gasp - grandstanding at the confirmation hearing

Cruz, Hawley, et al have some 'splainin to do. Though of course they won't be held accountable.


"But Mr. Hawley, Mr. Graham, Mr. Cotton and Mr. Cruz all voted to confirm judges nominated by President Donald J. Trump to appeals courts even though those nominees had given out sentences lighter than prosecutor recommendations in cases involving images of child sex abuse. Mr. Graham had also voted to confirm Judge Jackson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2021 in spite of the sentencing decisions she had made as a district judge.

In 2017, Judge Ralph R. Erickson was confirmed by a 95-to-1 vote to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, with Mr. Cotton, Mr. Cruz and Mr. Graham voting in the affirmative. (Mr. Hawley was not yet a senator.) While serving as a district court judge in North Dakota, Judge Erickson imposed sentences shorter than the prosecutor’s recommendations in nine cases involving child sex abuse imagery from 2009 to 2017, averaging 19 percent lower.


In the case with the greatest discrepancy — in which a 68-year-old man pleaded guilty to possessing and transporting such illicit materials — prosecutors asked for 151 months and Judge Erickson imposed a 96-month sentence."



[link:https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/24/us/politics/ketanji-brown-jackson-child-abuse-cases.html?referringSource=articleShare&fbclid=IwAR1v084WAXp0tXpfbOuJjAV8d68kJMv_xKKWie1se4EY9mVYp1yAW6EGDRI|



9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well lookee here. Seems Senate repubs were - gasp - grandstanding at the confirmation hearing (Original Post) mnmoderatedem Mar 2022 OP
Partisan politics as usual, although GOPers are particularly hateful vying for rube vote. Hoyt Mar 2022 #1
Thanks so much for posting, dem Leghorn21 Mar 2022 #2
Having cameras in front of them is their Gloria Swanson moment. BigmanPigman Mar 2022 #3
I despise these snakes. Joinfortmill Mar 2022 #4
That's an insult to snakes everywhere. calimary Mar 2022 #5
Hopefully, that info gets a lot of exposure (no pun intended). Their hypocrisy needs to be known. ificandream Mar 2022 #6
Just as everyone expected Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2022 #7
Kick BlueWavePsych Mar 2022 #8
They took it to the next level -- grandsucking Blue Owl Mar 2022 #9

BigmanPigman

(51,552 posts)
3. Having cameras in front of them is their Gloria Swanson moment.
Sun Mar 27, 2022, 11:31 PM
Mar 2022

They all love the spotlight. Maybe cameras shouldn't be allowed in the proceedings for normal TV viewing but on C-Span instead.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Well lookee here. Seems ...