General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge has determined that Donald TRUMP likely committed felony obstruction of Congress.
Link to tweet
Vinca
(50,249 posts)then the next higher court, until he reaches the Supremes and Clarence Thomas decides in his favor? Or, rather, Ginni Thomas.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)or are we just waiting?
and waiting.
and waiting.
and waiting.
and waiting.
and waiting.
and waiting.
and waiting.
and waiting.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,430 posts)They seem to have another agenda. And being the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, I can't imagine what that would be.
EleanorR
(2,389 posts)Magoo48
(4,700 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,046 posts)I just skimmed the opinion. I am law geek and I had to read this opinion. here is a link to the opinion
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.841840/gov.uscourts.cacd.841840.260.0.pdf
The judge bent over backward to find that Eastman had an attorney client privilege with TFG and that Eastman did not waive such privilege when Eastman improperly used Chapman University's email system. These were close issues and the judge gave the benefit of the doubt to Eastman and TFG.
The discussion of the crime fraud exception really made me smile
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
I love the last page of the opinion
Link to tweet
ShazzieB
(16,348 posts)No time to read it right now, but I've downloaded it to savor later.
gab13by13
(21,280 posts)Everyone knew this months ago. The emails going to the select committee tells me that DOJ is doing nothing about it.
DOJ doesn't need a criminal referral from the select committee to go after the man who wrote the blueprint for a coup. DOJ could have gotten those emails months ago if it wanted to.
It makes one wonder why Senator Mike Lee of Utah wanted Trump to replace FBI Director Comey with Merrick Garland? Maybe Lee just wanted to open up a spot on the DC Appeals court? Or maybe not?