General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBudi
(15,325 posts)Eastman, Giuliani etc.. & they damned near pulled it off on Jan 6.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)FYI for those who don't yet paste Twitter images here, copy the image link and paste here amended so the question mark and all following is replaced by .jpg, easy peasy.
dem4decades
(11,241 posts)bamagal62
(3,218 posts)Its so tiresome.
dem4decades
(11,241 posts)I mean, Barr is useless to Trump now, the next AG will be someone like Eastman, there will no constraints, just unleased power. But we will be able to rest our heads on our pillows and dream how we weren't political, even though the DOJ is not prosecuting today for political reasons.
Budi
(15,325 posts)Why did the R's vote down Garland's SC appointment?
Something doesn't add up.
FoxNewsSucks
(10,375 posts)Mr. Evil
(2,746 posts)Obama liked him so Mitch didn't. Even if Mitch liked him he couldn't like him because Obama selected him.
Budi
(15,325 posts)That's quite a stretch considering the talk now that Garland's obviously protecting his own Federalist peeps.
That makes no sense.
A seat opens up on the SC & a supposed Federalist loyalist is within votes of grabbing that prized spot, but they say 'Nope! Obama likes him. We'll pass.!
C'mon.
Mr. Evil
(2,746 posts)It doesn't make any sense. When was the last time Mitch McConnell actually made any sense? Remember when President Obama was first elected Mitch McConnell's first statement was that his priority was to make sure Obama was a one-term president.
Lovie777
(11,986 posts)the parallels.
Nevilledog
(50,659 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)One step at a time, one conspirator at a time. We see where the committee is heading, linking the members of Congress raising the objections to the criminal coup d'etat` plot in the White House.