If we use the Watergate investigation as a guide.

[fightforfreedom]

The people around Trump should be very, very worried. People like Meadows, Navarro, Rudy, etc. There is a very good chance many of them will eventually be indicted. That's what happened to the people around Nixon.

The toughest decision for Garland will be about Trump. Does he indict a former president? Does he name him as an Un-indicted Co-conspirator? Does he do nothing?

[gab13by13]

1. No comparison,

Watergate empaneled a grand jury, something that Nick Ackerman, Watergate prosecutor, stated just last night, that DOJ should be doing right now. Ackerman said that a grand jury would cut through all of the red tape and tremendously speed up this investigation.

[Emile]

2. +1

[Autumn]

3. You can't use Watergate as a guide. There is plenty of open evidence of Trumps crimes and his crew.

There were some decent Republican back then, there are none, zero now. It seems to me that it has been decided but not announced that one can't indict a President. Former or sitting. Just my opinion.

[panader0]

4. I agree. "one can't indict a President" "I could shoot a man of Fifth Ave and no one would care."

It's outrageous. Just like Barr's theory that the POTUS is above committing a crime.
Please DOJ, follow up on the J-6 committee's evidence and bring us justice. And
as far ahead of the mid-terms as possible.

[Autumn]

5. The fact that there is not a Grand Jury at this time is outrageous. This establishes that there

are two tiers of justice.

[AllaN01Bear]

6. i got a question, who put in the tape recorder and the bugs @ the white house ??

[CentralMass]

7. Watergate ? The bugs were not in the Whitehouse and the tapes were from a system

In the Whitehouse thar recorded all of the Presidents (Nixon) conversations.