Why Teachers Are Afraid to Teach History

[Nevilledog]

Link to tweet

Tweet text:

The New Republic
@newrepublic
“We have teachers who are walking on eggshells worried that they’re going to have a picture taken by a student or parent, that they are going to be unfairly targeted for the work that they’re doing.”

newrepublic.com
Why Teachers Are Afraid to Teach History
The attacks on CRT have terrified our educators. But the public school system has always made it hard to teach controversial subjects.
5:41 PM · Mar 30, 2022

https://newrepublic.com/article/165598/teachers-afraid-teach-history

No paywall
https://archive.ph/R1TRx

For a decade, Jonathan Greenberg, a social studies teacher at the Center School in Seattle, taught an advanced placement course for high schoolers called Citizenship and Social Justice. A broad-shouldered man with penetrating eyes and a warm manner, Greenberg brought in speakers to talk about their experiences of racism and invited his students to share, too. Sometimes, he separated them by race so they could consider questions more privately. In an exercise known as “affinity-based caucusing,” he might ask white students, “What’s the role of a white person in fighting racism at school?” Students of color, meanwhile, might share how they cope with discrimination they’ve faced.

Greenberg shaped his curriculum according to guidelines developed by Courageous Conversation, a group founded in 1992 to help teachers facilitate dialogues about race. The organization intends its discussions to be structured by four agreements: to stay engaged, to expect discomfort, to tell the truth, and to accept a lack of closure. Frank talk about encounters with racism, Greenberg believed, would help bring attention to the struggles of underrepresented populations at his majority-white public school, and help all his students link their present lives with the historical realities of race.

In December 2012, the parents of a white student in Greenberg’s class filed a complaint with the principal. Greenberg, they alleged, had not only created “an emotionally-charged classroom environment” and a “climate of fear,” he had fomented “racial hatred and prejudice.” The complaint made its way to the school district, and, within a month, Seattle Public Schools launched an HR investigation and told Greenberg that he could not teach the racism curriculum or a planned unit about gender before the investigation concluded. Besides the teen whose parents initiated the complaint, officials interviewed no students about their experience in the class. By mid-February, the superintendent wrote Greenberg that his lessons had created an “intimidating” atmosphere for the student and “disrupted the educational environment” for others. Students began circulating a petition demanding that the curriculum inspired by Courageous Conversation be reinstated; ultimately, they gathered more than 1,000 signatures. One day, as another teacher supervised Greenberg’s class, some students signed the petition. The parents who’d originally objected filed a second complaint, this time for harassment. Within months, the district transferred Greenberg to another school.

Nine years later, as states rush to pass laws banning “critical race theory,” a term that in popular usage on the right has come to mean nearly any curriculum that refers to systemic or structural racism, teachers around the country are wondering whether they’ll meet similar fates. By the end of January, more than 35 states had introduced bills or taken other steps that would restrict classroom discussions of race and gender, and at least 14 had passed laws or directives. The content of the laws varies somewhat from place to place. In Tennessee, for example, legislators banned 11 “concepts” from public school instruction. Educators aren’t allowed to promote “division between, or resentment of, a race” or suggest that individuals should feel “discomfort,” “guilt,” or “anguish” because of their race. In Iowa, lawmakers prohibit describing the state or the country as “systemically racist or sexist.”

*snip*

[Ron Green]

1. My segregated public high school was perfectly happy in 1964 to teach us

about the glories of the Confederacy and the depredations of the carpetbaggers and scalawags. Meanwhile, a mile and a half away, Black children my age sat in a classroom in a building called “colored high school.”

I’ve always wondered what they were taught about Reconstruction.

[Ilsa]

6. Don't forget they'd also call President Grant

a drunk and a poor president.

[róisín_dubh]

2. It's extending to universities as well.

I’m on my way out and couldn’t be happier.

[no_hypocrisy]

3. I was fired for teaching a detailed narrative of Emmett Till to 14 yo African-American boys

at a charter school in Paterson. I left no detail out. Told them that Emmett Till was their age and with a different time and place, they too could have been (or could be) Emmett Till.

I'm a middle aged white woman who taught that and it was the first time the students ever heard of Emmett Till. I was inspired (or provoked) to talk for 20 minutes because the school handed out a lame-ass two paragraph "essay" about Till.

Let's say I did my job too well. I was fired and never told why.

[Solly Mack]

4. K&R

[Irish_Dem]

5. That's the goal. Like in Russia and China, only teach the party line.