Ukrainians are striking Russian targets INSIDE Russia

[Nevilledog]

Link to tweet

[dalton99a]

1. Good.

[Nevilledog]

2. Fuck yeah. Bottom video shows the attack.

Link to tweet

?s=21&t=CrdY5I2_aYLvB6pF2Sr0IQ

[I_UndergroundPanther]

3. yeah!

Ukraine is kickin' ass!!!

[Demovictory9]

9. Double good!!!

[lapfog_1]

4. if they had the capability

would they turn Moscow into a devastated ruin?

Remember the allies in WW2 started unrestricted bombing of Germany AFTER the London blitz by Germany. Dresden comes to mind.

At least there is one target on the Black Sea they should consider...

[fierywoman]

6. SLAVA UKRAINI !!!

[Nevilledog]

7. I'd love to see what $1 billion dollars worth of rubble looks like

[blue-wave]

15. If I might also add

that bridge to Crimea.

[RockRaven]

5. The governor cited in the first bit is a Putin appointee.

And ELINT News is a one-man operation based in the UK.

And Russians use Mi-24s too. Heck, they are the ones who build (and sell) them.

I don't see much reason to believe any of this, as presented, until corroborated by more reliable sources. It could be completely true, it could be partially true, or it could also be utter bullshit.

[roamer65]

8. Hopefully Ukraine invades Russian territory.

[Crunchy Frog]

10. I wonder if it's a false flag.

[wnylib]

16. By Russia? To what end?

[Crunchy Frog]

24. "See? They really were planning to attack us."

I'm not saying it makes logical sense, but neither do the Trumpers and they still manage to get quite a bit of mileage.

[Brother Buzz]

11. Blown Up, Sir!

[Nevilledog]

12. That's one of my favorite movies

[Cheezoholic]

13. Thats an attack on a G20 member

Im not sure but if someone flips a raisin into a G20 member's corn flakes at the breakfast table utter chaos will result, with massive milk smacking.

[everyonematters]

14. My thoughts on this go both ways.

The Ukrainians taking it to the Russians can help make the people realize the cost of the war. On the other hand, this could escalate the war, giving the Russians an excuse to attack NATO.

[wnylib]

17. Why would it be an excuse to attack NATO?

[everyonematters]

20. NATO is supporting Ukraine, Ukraine attacked them.

It's not really rational, but neither was attacking Ukraine.

[wnylib]

21. Maybe, but for Ukraine to take the war

to Russia is not a new or unusual thing in a war.

When one country attacks another, the attacked country fights back. Fighting back also means taking the war back into the attacking nation.

UK bombings of Berlin after Nazi Germany bombed London. US bombing of Japan after Japan bombed US territory in the Pacific. It is the norm for war.

[Samrob]

19. They already have an "excuse" to attack NATO. This would not be a good "excuse" since

Ukraine is NOT a member of NATO.

[lagomorph777]

27. That depot looks like a legitimate military target to me.

It's undoubtedly been used to fuel the invasion.

Putin can go fuck himself.

[Samrob]

18. YES!!! This what it is going to take.

If nukes...so beit. We are all in this together whether we like it or not, whether we believe it or not. Diminish the nuke threat...if the world stands together.

[Shanti Shanti Shanti]

22. Tit for tat, u blow up our oil depots?, here's some of that back, baby!

[brush]

23. Turn about is fair play. I hope they destroy as much...

of Russia as they can.

[2naSalit]

25. I've been wondering when they would be able to...

Do that. Maybe they can get some drones over the locations lobbing missiles. A few exploding drones could take out a bunch of ships that are firing from the Black sea too.

[UTUSN]

26. K&R