Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow to rein in partisan Supreme Court justices (Brookings Institute)
Link to tweet
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2022/03/23/how-to-rein-in-partisan-supreme-court-justices/
*snip*
The impression of a highly politicized court is the result of decisions that flout bedrock principles of judicial comportmentnorms such as meaningful respect for precedent, open and deliberative process, evidence-based, reasoned, and publicly explained decisions, deference to democratically elected or selected officials, and good faith fidelity to what relevant legal provisions say and what they have long been understood to mean.
For instance, on February 7 of this year, the Court, by a 5-4 vote, bypassed regular order to suspend implementation of a unanimous ruling by a panel of three lower court judgestwo Trump appointees and one Obama appointee. The panel had held that the 1965 Voting Rights Act required invalidation of the Alabama legislatures 2022 congressional election district map; that map yielded one black representative and six white representatives, although blacks constitute 27% of the states voters. The extraordinary interventionby Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neal Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrettinfuriated, not only the three liberal justicesStephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kaganbut conservative Chief Justice John Roberts. Roberts scolded his customary alliesThe district court properly applied existing law in an extensive opinion with no apparent errors for our correction.
In effect, the five-justice majority had rushed to nullify longstanding statutory ballot access guarantees designed to protect an essential Democratic constituency, applicable nationwide, months before the 2022 congressional elections. The prevailing justices used an expedited procedure traditionally reserved for rare and genuine emergencies. In this instance, the procedure afforded a drastically foreshortened opportunity for briefing to acquaint the justices with the circumstances of the case, no opinion for the Court, nor any articulated rationale.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor had, during an oral argument two months earlier, sharply censured the conservative blocs similarly irregular intervention to sideline longstanding abortion rights protections. Can this institution survive, Sotomayor fairly spat out, the stench that this creates in the public perception that the constitution and its reading are just political acts?
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 715 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How to rein in partisan Supreme Court justices (Brookings Institute) (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Apr 2022
OP
PortTack
(32,782 posts)1. Bookmarking
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)2. Don't elect GOPer Presidents and/or Senators.
dmr
(28,347 posts)3. If only we could rid ourselves of
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neal Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.
I don't care how we rid ourselves of these unqualified partisans.