Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,855 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 09:38 PM Apr 2022

Obama: "I underestimated" disinformation's threat to democracies

Obama: "I underestimated" disinformation's threat to democracies

Shawna Chen at Axios

https://www.axios.com/obama-disinformation-democracy-7a1b3cf4-b34a-47e4-a432-fbb3ac880114.html


"SNIP.......

What he's saying: "If you asked me what I'm most concerned about when I think back toward the end of my presidency, it probably has more to do with the topic here today," Obama said Wednesday at a conference on disinformation presented by The Atlantic and the University of Chicago Institute of Politics.

* "It's something I grappled with a lot during my presidency.

* I saw it sort of unfold, and that is the degree to which information, disinformation, misinformation was being weaponized."

* "And we saw it, but I think I underestimated the degree to which democracies were as vulnerable to it as they were, including ours," he noted.

* 4Misinformation is "wrong information," but disinformation is "a systematic effort to either promote false information, to suppress true information, for the purpose of political gain, financial gain, enhancing power, suppressing others, targeting those you don't like," he said."

It is difficult for me to see how we win the contest of ideas if in fact we are not able to agree on a baseline of facts that allow the marketplace of ideas to work."

......SNIP"

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama: "I underestimated" disinformation's threat to democracies (Original Post) applegrove Apr 2022 OP
Well Solly Mack Apr 2022 #1
Smart people often underestimate how easily Phoenix61 Apr 2022 #2
People who are allegedly educated... nycbos Apr 2022 #4
Educated and smart are two different things. Phoenix61 Apr 2022 #5
I don't know if it is so much that they believe it.... TheRealNorth Apr 2022 #10
He's not alone. I don't think most thought that this many people would lose their minds the way chowder66 Apr 2022 #3
In hindsight - We all should have clued in with Sarah Palin Diablo del sol Apr 2022 #11
Even before Palin, there were the "Swiftboaters" kskiska Apr 2022 #14
Difference that was a planned hit job Diablo del sol Apr 2022 #16
And disinformation was Putin's specialty in the KGB dalton99a Apr 2022 #6
There was no counter strategy apparently BootinUp Apr 2022 #7
Which is why you don't turn the other cheek, or fall forward. Baitball Blogger Apr 2022 #8
K&R, US disinformation threat is via MAGA Media lead by FAUX NewZ. uponit7771 Apr 2022 #9
I do not believe that Bill Clinton faced as much disinformation and lying as Obama and Biden, but Samrob Apr 2022 #12
The internet was not fully formed canetoad Apr 2022 #15
I believe all Democratic Presidents have underestimated the evil Ferrets are Cool Apr 2022 #13
Yes. The problem better get fixed quickly. Boomerproud Apr 2022 #19
Fox News did not launch until the fall of 1996. summer_in_TX Apr 2022 #17
It was shocking how many regular people, not nuts, fell for it. Really shocking. Here too. betsuni Apr 2022 #18

Phoenix61

(17,021 posts)
2. Smart people often underestimate how easily
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 09:49 PM
Apr 2022

stupid people can be duped. I doubt Obama has spent a lot of time around a lot of stupid people.

nycbos

(6,039 posts)
4. People who are allegedly educated...
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 09:53 PM
Apr 2022

... belive far right wing conspiracy theories. Look no further than the people who allegedly have medical degrees who believe conspiracy theories about vaccines.

Phoenix61

(17,021 posts)
5. Educated and smart are two different things.
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 09:55 PM
Apr 2022

Hence there are smart people with little formal education and stupid people with a lot of formal education. The GQP is full of the latter.

TheRealNorth

(9,500 posts)
10. I don't know if it is so much that they believe it....
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 11:10 PM
Apr 2022

Or that they see a bunch of easy marks and think they can profit in some way.

chowder66

(9,088 posts)
3. He's not alone. I don't think most thought that this many people would lose their minds the way
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 09:52 PM
Apr 2022

they have. It really took off when he was elected. White people freaked the hell out.

 

Diablo del sol

(424 posts)
11. In hindsight - We all should have clued in with Sarah Palin
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 11:17 PM
Apr 2022

Ignorant, obnoxious, liar, fake Christian, and the people with the same traits ate it up.

 

Diablo del sol

(424 posts)
16. Difference that was a planned hit job
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 11:35 PM
Apr 2022

Palin was just flat out ignorant and obnoxious. They wanted and loved her hate filled drivel.

Baitball Blogger

(46,770 posts)
8. Which is why you don't turn the other cheek, or fall forward.
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 10:03 PM
Apr 2022

Last edited Thu Apr 7, 2022, 10:15 AM - Edit history (1)

Sometimes you have to turn and deal with the elephant in the room.

Samrob

(4,298 posts)
12. I do not believe that Bill Clinton faced as much disinformation and lying as Obama and Biden, but
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 11:24 PM
Apr 2022

I recall that his administration had what they called "rapid responders" As soon as some BS was reported by the media, especially RW media, a swarth of Dems would hit the airways the next 24 hours or less and call out the BS and explain the facts. Clinton was good at explaining some of the most complicated economic and social issues in a way that even the RW idiots could understand. Many didn't like him but they were better informed

canetoad

(17,200 posts)
15. The internet was not fully formed
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 11:32 PM
Apr 2022

During the Clinton administration.

I was online relatively early, before html and the www. I loved cyberspace; it was a new and exciting concept. However it prompted some serious thought on the nature of truth and lies. If enough people on the web say it's true - does it make it so?

Conversely, is 'the truth' something that the majority decides?

Look to interconnectivity to trace the origins of disinformation.

summer_in_TX

(2,764 posts)
17. Fox News did not launch until the fall of 1996.
Thu Apr 7, 2022, 12:12 AM
Apr 2022

Before they launched there was a whole PR campaign to undermine the "liberal media" and try to pry their viewers off for FOX. When it launched, it started with some 17 million cable users who could watch it.

The lingering effect of that campaign was to undermine faith in the traditional news and make it nearly impossible to get those viewers to trust any other sources or even check them out.

betsuni

(25,712 posts)
18. It was shocking how many regular people, not nuts, fell for it. Really shocking. Here too.
Thu Apr 7, 2022, 02:38 AM
Apr 2022

But I thought even Trump fans would get tired of The Trump Nonesuch Show by November 2016 and prefer four to eight years of enjoying hating President Hillary Clinton every day. Wrong! But only by a few votes in swing states and mostly anti-Hillary misinformation votes, not pro-Trump.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama: "I underestimated"...