General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama: "I underestimated" disinformation's threat to democracies
Obama: "I underestimated" disinformation's threat to democracies
Shawna Chen at Axios
https://www.axios.com/obama-disinformation-democracy-7a1b3cf4-b34a-47e4-a432-fbb3ac880114.html
"SNIP.......
What he's saying: "If you asked me what I'm most concerned about when I think back toward the end of my presidency, it probably has more to do with the topic here today," Obama said Wednesday at a conference on disinformation presented by The Atlantic and the University of Chicago Institute of Politics.
* "It's something I grappled with a lot during my presidency.
* I saw it sort of unfold, and that is the degree to which information, disinformation, misinformation was being weaponized."
* "And we saw it, but I think I underestimated the degree to which democracies were as vulnerable to it as they were, including ours," he noted.
* 4Misinformation is "wrong information," but disinformation is "a systematic effort to either promote false information, to suppress true information, for the purpose of political gain, financial gain, enhancing power, suppressing others, targeting those you don't like," he said."
It is difficult for me to see how we win the contest of ideas if in fact we are not able to agree on a baseline of facts that allow the marketplace of ideas to work."
......SNIP"
Solly Mack
(90,794 posts)Phoenix61
(17,021 posts)stupid people can be duped. I doubt Obama has spent a lot of time around a lot of stupid people.
nycbos
(6,039 posts)... belive far right wing conspiracy theories. Look no further than the people who allegedly have medical degrees who believe conspiracy theories about vaccines.
Phoenix61
(17,021 posts)Hence there are smart people with little formal education and stupid people with a lot of formal education. The GQP is full of the latter.
TheRealNorth
(9,500 posts)Or that they see a bunch of easy marks and think they can profit in some way.
chowder66
(9,088 posts)they have. It really took off when he was elected. White people freaked the hell out.
Diablo del sol
(424 posts)Ignorant, obnoxious, liar, fake Christian, and the people with the same traits ate it up.
kskiska
(27,048 posts)who lost John Kerry the election.
Diablo del sol
(424 posts)Palin was just flat out ignorant and obnoxious. They wanted and loved her hate filled drivel.
dalton99a
(81,648 posts)Putin called it "human relations"
BootinUp
(47,201 posts)Its a little shocking.
Baitball Blogger
(46,770 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 7, 2022, 10:15 AM - Edit history (1)
Sometimes you have to turn and deal with the elephant in the room.
uponit7771
(90,367 posts)Samrob
(4,298 posts)I recall that his administration had what they called "rapid responders" As soon as some BS was reported by the media, especially RW media, a swarth of Dems would hit the airways the next 24 hours or less and call out the BS and explain the facts. Clinton was good at explaining some of the most complicated economic and social issues in a way that even the RW idiots could understand. Many didn't like him but they were better informed
canetoad
(17,200 posts)During the Clinton administration.
I was online relatively early, before html and the www. I loved cyberspace; it was a new and exciting concept. However it prompted some serious thought on the nature of truth and lies. If enough people on the web say it's true - does it make it so?
Conversely, is 'the truth' something that the majority decides?
Look to interconnectivity to trace the origins of disinformation.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,111 posts)that the repug party is capable.
Boomerproud
(7,973 posts)Making speeches to the choir isn't a solution.
summer_in_TX
(2,764 posts)Before they launched there was a whole PR campaign to undermine the "liberal media" and try to pry their viewers off for FOX. When it launched, it started with some 17 million cable users who could watch it.
The lingering effect of that campaign was to undermine faith in the traditional news and make it nearly impossible to get those viewers to trust any other sources or even check them out.
betsuni
(25,712 posts)But I thought even Trump fans would get tired of The Trump Nonesuch Show by November 2016 and prefer four to eight years of enjoying hating President Hillary Clinton every day. Wrong! But only by a few votes in swing states and mostly anti-Hillary misinformation votes, not pro-Trump.