General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge restores Jan. 6 defendant's gun rights over DOJ objection
A judge has restored a Texas womans right to possess firearms just weeks after she was sentenced for illegally entering the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
--snip--
The judges ruling was a rebuke to prosecutors, who opposed the change, and it was the latest setback for prosecutors dealt by McFadden, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump. The decision further cements the judges reputation as the most skeptical member of the D.C. District Court bench about the stance prosecutors have taken in the wake of the Capitol riot.
In his two-page ruling on Thursday, McFadden noted that Cudd wore a bulletproof sweatshirt to the Jan. 6 rally, but he credited her explanation that she wore the defensive garment because she feared violence, not because she was seeking it.
The Government presented no evidence that Cudd incited anyone to violence, McFadden wrote. Nor did it present evidence that she participated in violence. She has no prior criminal history. And Cudds bullet proof sweatshirt is consistent with her fear of being attacked at the rally preceding her entry into the Capitol. This says nothing about her danger to others.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/04/07/january-6-defendant-gun-rights-restored-00023977
Go read the article, there is a lot more that is so very fucked up in it. This is the same TFG appointed judge that let one of the insurrectionists off by finding him not guilty because he believed the cops let him in. This nut case needs to be removed from the bench.
femmedem
(8,203 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Grins
(7,217 posts)She put on a bullet-proof vest because she feared violence?
If that was even remotely true - then why did she go?