General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am almost afraid to ask,
but does anyone understand why those two faux Democratic senators voted with their colleagues to confirm soon to be Justice Jackson??? They do not have much of a record of being on the correct side of most votes. I thought if the three GOP senators did vote as they said (and they did), it would be 51-49.
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)By voting to confirm Judge Jackson, they can claim (implausibly) that they're Democrats.
Regardless, I'm glad that they voted the way they did. She deserves to be on the Court and our country will be better for her service.
yardwork
(61,622 posts)PJMcK
(22,037 posts)Still, Democrats could do much better.
Manchin's ties to the coal industry are disgusting and antiquated.
Sinema's a cipher. She's also fairly stupid.
My opinions, of course.
yardwork
(61,622 posts)It's essential that Democrats retain control of the Senate. With every state getting two senators, that's a lot of red states. It's an uphill battle.
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)I yearn for progressive Democrats. I know they can't win in WV and AZ let alone in redder states.
Still...
brush
(53,784 posts)Just the fact that Sinema got in posing as an environmental Democrat is testament to that.
AZ Dems are pissed and Ruben Gallego is likely to primary her.
W VA is another matter though, not much chance there.
yardwork
(61,622 posts)It's an uphill battle.
brush
(53,784 posts)mcar
(42,334 posts)and worry about Sinema in 2024.
femmedem
(8,203 posts)gab13by13
(21,350 posts)Why did 10 GQP Senators vote to confirm Merrick Garland as AG, including Ron Johnson?
yardwork
(61,622 posts)You might find this interesting: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-congress-votes/kyrsten-sinema/
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)But I have to ask, do you think they're good Democrats?
brush
(53,784 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 9, 2022, 11:19 AM - Edit history (1)
help millions, not to mention help us Dems keep our majorities in Congress in the mid-terms.
They've both endangered that greatly, and if we lose the majorities, nothing of consequence will be accomplished in Joe Biden's last two years of this term in office.
They've done immeasurable damage.
yardwork
(61,622 posts)It's not helpful for Democrats to promote the false belief that Manchin and Sinema "never" support any of the Democratic positions. That misinformation leads to hopelessness and despair.
We need to elect more Democratic senators (and representatives) so that we have a safe majority. Promoting the idea that "we can't get anything done" plays into Republican campaign slogans.
brush
(53,784 posts)in replacing Manchin W VA, but we have a good shot in primarying and beating Sinema in AZ though. Dems are pissed there at Sinema's bait-and-switch act. She campaigned as an environmental Dem but on the big Biden/Dem bills critical for us to keep our majorities, she went the other way.
Shermann
(7,423 posts)brush
(53,784 posts)so they got with the Democratic agenda. Those two are still dangerous though.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Perhaps you should.
JohnSJ
(92,213 posts)nominees.
They also give us the majority at this time, and that is why they are essential until we have at least a two seat majority in the Senate
Also you should look at their voting record
Budi
(15,325 posts)I can think of a few that deserve that title.
(One however is no longer a Dem.)
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)GovTrack's just one site that'll give a quick glance to build in. Just plug in the name or compare the Democratic and Republican caucuses.
https://www.govtrack.us/about/analysis#leadership
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)TY for the link.