Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
Mon Apr 11, 2022, 05:23 PM Apr 2022

Nearing the end of their investigation, the J6 Committee has some tough decisions to make.

Should they subpoena Donald Trump, Mike Pence, and Don Jr to come before their Committee?
Should they subpoena Gosar, Biggs, and Brooks to answer questions, since they were so involved in the "Stop the Steal" movement?

Since Trump and Pence were part of the Executive Branch and no longer in office, there is no reason they should not be subpoenaed, in my opinion. Gosar, Biggs, and Brooks present a different problem, since they are part of the same Legislative Branch as the members on the Committee and they are still serving as Congressmen.

As for Don Jr, there is no reason he should not be subpoenaed, since the latest bombshell of his texts were made public. The texts show him to be conspiring to overthrow the election before the election was even called. His attorney said that he likely got the texts from someone else before he sent them? If so, how long before? Was it before Election Day? How long had it been planned? That "alibi" doesn't help Don Jr in the least.

There is no legal reason not to subpoena Trump and Pence. It would give the Congress a reason to reclaim their legitimacy from the Executive Branch. After all, they are the Representatives of the People.

The Committee could kill two birds with one stone, if they were to subpoena Trump and Pence. What right are they claiming, to prevent them from answering questions about January 6th and other questionable activities, involving the election of 2020?

If they refused the subpoenas, the Committee could then make a criminal referral to the DOJ for contempt of Congress, and it would not interfere with any investigations that the DOJ might have ongoing, which reportedly has been a concern of theirs. They would be treated no differently from Bannon, Scavino, Eastman, or others that might be subpoenaed in the next few weeks. They would have no legal excuse. They are only using "politics" and the possibility of running for President in 2024 as an excuse not to testify before the Committee. They should not be allowed to get away with it.

The subpoenas for Trump and Pence and the likelihood that both would ignore it, would give credence to contempt of Congress charges against both.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nearing the end of their investigation, the J6 Committee has some tough decisions to make. (Original Post) kentuck Apr 2022 OP
The J6 Committee should go for it all. All or Nothing. ProudMNDemocrat Apr 2022 #1
They need to wrap it up quickly, especially if it's true they think they have the evidence. Hoyt Apr 2022 #2
Who said they were near the end? Novara Apr 2022 #3
Agreed Triloon Apr 2022 #5
Interesting points kentuck leftieNanner Apr 2022 #4
The small problem if they do not make a criminal referral... kentuck Apr 2022 #6
I'm sure this is like a chess game for those involved. kentuck Apr 2022 #7
They cannot afford to make a mistake. Correct. leftieNanner Apr 2022 #9
no tv hearings? AllaN01Bear Apr 2022 #8
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. They need to wrap it up quickly, especially if it's true they think they have the evidence.
Mon Apr 11, 2022, 05:35 PM
Apr 2022

Refer trump to DOJ and issue a report. This week is fine with me.

Novara

(5,851 posts)
3. Who said they were near the end?
Mon Apr 11, 2022, 05:38 PM
Apr 2022

They haven't had public hearings yet, which are slated for May and June, and they are expected to release their report in September.

They are nowhere near the end. In fact, it looks like they have a long way to go. Let's let them do their job and see what else they uncover, because I'll bet there's a mountain of shit still there.

Triloon

(506 posts)
5. Agreed
Mon Apr 11, 2022, 06:00 PM
Apr 2022

Where does this idea of them being "near the end" come from? I mean, besides wishful thinking...

leftieNanner

(15,144 posts)
4. Interesting points kentuck
Mon Apr 11, 2022, 05:40 PM
Apr 2022

I don't think they should subpoena The Orange One. He would make it into a full blown drama and drag it all through the courts (including up to "His" Supreme Court). Besides, he would just lie if they ever were able to get him into the room.

If they have sufficient evidence to refer him to DOJ for an indictment, I think that's the way to go.

Just IMHO.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
6. The small problem if they do not make a criminal referral...
Mon Apr 11, 2022, 06:11 PM
Apr 2022

Trump and his supporters will say they had nothing on him, otherwise they would have charged him. It might diminish any investigation that the DOJ might have ?

There are no easy answers here.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
7. I'm sure this is like a chess game for those involved.
Mon Apr 11, 2022, 06:34 PM
Apr 2022

The Committee cannot afford to make a mistake at this time.

leftieNanner

(15,144 posts)
9. They cannot afford to make a mistake. Correct.
Mon Apr 11, 2022, 06:52 PM
Apr 2022

That's why I'm so glad we have some of the best and brightest minds on that committee. They will be sure to put all of the pieces together before they move forward. Hope to see a criminal referral to DOJ soon.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nearing the end of their ...