Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Demovictory9

(32,475 posts) Mon Apr 11, 2022, 08:18 PM Apr 2022

"First they came for the 2nd amendment and I didnt speak out.."

Link to tweet

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"First they came for the 2nd amendment and I didnt speak out.." (Original Post) Demovictory9 Apr 2022 OP

😄 underpants Apr 2022 #1

... dweller Apr 2022 #2

Exactly!!! Demovictory9 Apr 2022 #3

To be honest zipplewrath Apr 2022 #4

underpants

(182,886 posts)

1. 😄

Reply to Demovictory9 (Original post)

Mon Apr 11, 2022, 08:22 PM

Apr 2022

dweller

(23,663 posts)

2. ...

Reply to Demovictory9 (Original post)

Mon Apr 11, 2022, 08:27 PM

Apr 2022

✌🏻

Demovictory9

(32,475 posts)

3. Exactly!!!

Reply to dweller (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 11, 2022, 08:34 PM

Apr 2022

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)

4. To be honest

Reply to dweller (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 11, 2022, 08:39 PM

Apr 2022

There are always liberals/leftists/progressives who advocate for European/Australian kind of laws which would extremely limit personal gun ownership up to and including confiscation. The reality though, a bit like the cartoon above, is that such a thing is probably politically unreasonable in the US. While we may ultimately achieve a much more severe level of gun ownership requirements., ultimately if one is capable of demonstrating a reasonable level of gun ownership, one will be able to own as many weapons as they want. One really bad action though, and it gets all taken away.

Reply to this discussion