General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie gave the go-ahead for 2024 memo
The Vermont senator wants it known that he must be part of any conversation about a potential open Democratic primary in 2024.
By HOLLY OTTERBEIN
04/21/2022 06:04 PM EDT
When Bernie Sanders aides sent out a memo this week revealing that the Vermont senator hadnt closed the door to a third bid for president, they blasted it far and wide.
That was precisely the point: While Sanders has no current plans to run in 2024, no one should forget that he remains popular, is the undisputed leader of the progressive left and that he must be part of any conversation about a potential open Democratic presidential primary. Until now, he wasnt.
A person close to the process said Sanders approved the concept and execution of the memo.
I know people who got it who werent Bernie staff, who were other Democrats friendly with Bernieworld but not known as hardcore Bernie-ites, said a former Sanders campaign aide, who requested anonymity to speak frankly about the memo. They wanted it out.
snip
more at link
question everything
(47,483 posts)When will the DNC learn the lesson?
And for the ones who want to alert - he IS NOT a Democrat!
AZProgressive
(29,322 posts)He has one of the most liberal voting records in the Senate so for all intents and purposes he is a Democrat. Especially considering he runs in the Democratic Party primaries.
question everything
(47,483 posts)seats in 2020 because the image of the party was of a "socialist," of being run by Sanders and the "squad."
As much as many here do not like it, many Democrats do not wish to be associated with the left wing of the party. If the party will continue to have this image, if the party will continue to emphasize "identity politics" we will lose. Big.
I am still amazed that many here lament the separation of the Infrastructure bill and the social plans one (now called BBB). Both would have never passed and we would have nothing to show for accomplishment.
AZProgressive
(29,322 posts)It is actually Bernie Sanders supporters that constantly rail against identity politics. Now supporting Bernie is supporting identity politics LOL
Democratic messaging is so inconsistent also dont buy into narratives or scapegoats. The Democrats won more House seats than they did in 2016 and a couple that lost was Max Rose who campaigned against AOC and De Blasio. A Peterson that told a voter that Ilhan Omar doesnt belong in the Democratic primary. Losing House seats was not as big as deal as not having a 60 vote majority in the Senate. House Democrats can pass almost whatever they want, most of it doesnt pass the Senate and if it has a chance conservative Democrats will kill it.
Progressives were right that BBB would die if it was separated from what used to be a Republican infrastructure bill.
I wish Bernie Sanders wouldnt run though and endorse one of the younger progressives.
Republicans have used the socialist attack since the I started following politics.
emulatorloo
(44,130 posts)and he never did. but he hired surrogates. Others may be able to forget how ugly his surrogates were but I cant. They unscrupulously lied about Beto and every candidate who wasnt Bernie.
No thanks.
AZProgressive
(29,322 posts)And some others. There were other third party advocates I strongly disagree with.
If he does run again I hope he hires better staff.
emulatorloo
(44,130 posts)I was a staunch Bernie supporter in 2016. Weaver did not do a damn thing to broaden Bernies coalition, which is what Bernie needed in order to win the primary.
I blamed Weaver for the loss.
Bernie hires shitty people, I finally got it when he brought in those jerks like Sirota
Response to AZProgressive (Reply #14)
emulatorloo This message was self-deleted by its author.
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)as I understand it, he runs in the primary as a Dem then switches when he wins the primary. It's been a none of contention for a while now.
AZProgressive
(29,322 posts)He agrees to run in the Vermont Democratic Party.. continues his candidacy as an independent and the party agrees not to fund an opponent.
emulatorloo
(44,130 posts)and who, I'd like to know put that sweetheart deal together?
sl8
(13,781 posts)letting the Republican win.
Me.
(35,454 posts)or ethical for that matter.
sl8
(13,781 posts)Continue to split the vote and put Republicans in office, or ...?
Me.
(35,454 posts)But hey, how about a full out, no holds barred, support for the DEm candidate which is how it should be. There are always other people in a race. And I wonder why the DEms feel they can't find a winning candidate, have they even tried? Or, given that their party won't support them do qualified Dems who'd like to run feel hopeless and just give up.
Me.
(35,454 posts)it's like the fix is in, IMHO
FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)Who have d's after their name, but do the bidding of Moscow Mitch
TexasTowelie
(112,214 posts)doesn't that mean he is part of the establishment?
Asking for a friend.
JoeOtterbein
(7,702 posts)...I doubt it.
Your friend,
Joe
iemanja
(53,032 posts)but he's not part of the establishment. His brilliance is that he's convinced people to believe that. Everyone has their talents.
Me.
(35,454 posts)I don't believe it's up to him and his aides...aka his wife.
LudwigPastorius
(9,149 posts)the president".
iemanja
(53,032 posts)This while we have a sitting president in the White House eligible for re-election.
All this talk about alternative candidates in 2024 shows, at the very least, disrespect for President Biden.
How can we expect the public to value Biden when our own party doesn't?
emulatorloo
(44,130 posts)Could not agree with you more.
emulatorloo
(44,130 posts)Yes I understand the idea is he wouldnt run unless Biden decides not to run.
But it will undoubtedly give some twitterverse Bernie supporters an excuse/reason to ramp up nonsense and lies about Biden from here on out.
Bernie supporter when he ran against Hillary. Never again. Putting this out now shows poor judgement. I like him but enough.