Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
Fri Apr 22, 2022, 04:07 PM Apr 2022

Voters can't decide fate of massive tax cuts, Supreme Court rules

BY: JIM SMALL - APRIL 21, 2022 3:54 PM

The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled that voters cannot determine the fate of a flat tax proposal that Republican lawmakers and Gov. Doug Ducey championed last year.

Arizona’s constitution broadly lets voters refer new laws to the ballot, and that’s what happened to the $1.3 billion tax cut package that legislators approved in 2021. However, such referrals are not allowed for laws related to the “support and maintenance” of state government, and the Supreme Court said Thursday that the income tax cuts fall into that category.

That means the November ballot measure won’t happen.

https://www.azmirror.com/blog/voters-cant-decide-fate-of-massive-tax-cuts-supreme-court-rules/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Voters can't decide fate of massive tax cuts, Supreme Court rules (Original Post) turbinetree Apr 2022 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Apr 2022 #1
You would think so... turbinetree Apr 2022 #2
Only when those judges aren't doing what the GOP wants Bettie Apr 2022 #3
Like a few on the supreme court. Claustrum Apr 2022 #4
Yep, that's it. Bettie Apr 2022 #5

Response to turbinetree (Original post)

Bettie

(16,109 posts)
3. Only when those judges aren't doing what the GOP wants
Fri Apr 22, 2022, 04:09 PM
Apr 2022

if the activist judges are activist in favor or right wingers and super rich people, they are good with it.

Bettie

(16,109 posts)
5. Yep, that's it.
Fri Apr 22, 2022, 04:53 PM
Apr 2022

they are all for activism as long as it is activism that benefits the rich and powerful and/or screws the poor/powerless or anyone who wants to help them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Voters can't decide fate ...